Sunflower prices in the domestic market of Ukraine returned to the level of 13.5-14 thousand UAH/ton, which corresponds to the indicator of the beginning of December, the information and analytical agency “APK-Inform” reported.
“Despite the decline in prices on the export market of sunflower oil, the need to replenish the raw material base and growing competition with exporters forced processors to raise purchase prices,” analysts explained.
According to their data, as of December 25, the demand prices of processing enterprises have increased to 13.5-14 thousand UAH/ton of SRT, and in western and southern regions they often reach 14.5 thousand UAH/ton under the same conditions.
At the same time, processing companies note that the previous price decrease has significantly reduced the supply of oilseeds on the market. Agrarians continue to restrain sales, expecting an increase in demand and prices after the resumption of sunflower exports to Bulgaria.
“The resumption of Ukrainian oilseed exports to Bulgaria is still only in the process and is expected no earlier than January after the approval of licenses, for which applications have already started to be submitted,” warns APK-Inform.
Meest China has launched delivery from China to Kazakhstan. At present, the company is shipping parcels weighing up to 30 kg and costing up to EUR 1,000 and providing targeted delivery throughout the country. Shipments from the warehouse in China are made once a week, and delivery by road takes up to 14 days. The cost of the service starts at $5 per kilogram of cargo. Customers also have access to additional services such as buyback, parcel consolidation, and warehouse photography.
As a reminder, in December, the company started delivering from South Korea to Ukraine. The company accepts orders from popular marketplaces selling electronics, cosmetics, clothing, and accessories in the form of postal items weighing up to 20 kg and costing up to 150 euros.
“We have gained a good momentum in opening new markets and expanding the range of services. We ship not only from China, but also from South Korea, and we have added Kazakhstan to the list of recipient countries. We will continue to work,” said Mykhailo Lymar, CEO and Managing Partner of Meest China.
delivering_Ukraine, delivery_China, delivery_Kazakhstan, Meest_China, Mykhailo_Lymar
Large-scale and high-quality training of UAV operators requires changes to the Ministry of Defense regulations and implementation of relevant state standards
In addition to increasing the production of various unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU), it is imperative to increase the number of trained UAV operators who will have the appropriate state certificates and will be able to effectively destroy Russian occupiers and conduct aerial reconnaissance. To achieve this, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine needs to amend some of its regulations and, with the participation of UAV manufacturers, training centers and the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, develop and approve appropriate state training programs and certification of trained UAV operators. In addition, local governments and military administrations can and should play an important role in solving this problem.
This was discussed at the roundtable “Actual Problems of UAV Operators Training” held on December 19 at the state news agency Ukrinform at the initiative of the online analytical publication KyivVlada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_BiHJsiGAg&t=1s
Recently, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced at a press conference that one million FPV drones will be produced in Ukraine next year. Prior to that, the President emphasized that protecting Ukraine from the Russian Federation is everyone’s business, especially those in the rear, including local governments.
At the same time, since the main customer of UAVs is the Ministry of Defense at the request of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the first question that was discussed was why the Ministry of Defense does not pay private centers for training UAV operators? According to Anton Podlutskyi, the host of the roundtable and co-founder of KyivVlada, other government agencies, such as the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, and the National Police, pay for the training of UAV operators for their own needs.
Maksym Polyvianyi, Executive Director of the National Association of Defense Industry Enterprises of Ukraine (NAUDI), noted that the main problem with the Ministry of Defense not contracting and paying for UAV operator training is the lack of an appropriate regulatory framework. “The Ministry of Defense, and now the Defense Procurement Agency, which will start purchasing weapons and military equipment, including UAVs, next year, has no regulatory basis for separately signing contracts for training services,” said the NAUDI executive director.
In his professional opinion, it is necessary to create a regulatory framework for certification of training centers for UAV operators of any purpose – from aerial reconnaissance to FPV drones, from tactical UAVs to strategic UAVs. “Each contract for the purchase of UAVs from a manufacturer should include several training sessions for representatives of the Armed Forces. The manufacturer should develop a training program – time, theory, practice, all of this is specified in the contract and carried out directly by the manufacturer,” emphasized Maksym Polyvianyi.
He also said that NAUDI and the National Aviation University (NAU) have launched a joint program under which the Association awards scholarships to students who will work as technical and engineering specialists at UAV manufacturing companies.
Nadiia Omelchenko, CEO of Militech, a drone manufacturing company, who is involved in the development of state standards for UAV operator education, emphasized that a systematic and high-quality solution to the problem requires collaboration between manufacturers, the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Education, and volunteer movements.
“The military says there are not enough training centers for UAV operators. However, not every training center, even from manufacturers, can issue the appropriate certificate. However, we, as manufacturers, are very interested in having well-trained specialists flying our UAVs. Our training center first teaches the theoretical part, then simulator training, and out of a group of 10-20 students, not all of them make it to the third part of the training – field tests. But we can only organize field tests in cooperation with the Armed Forces. So even here we need collaboration,” said the Militech CEO.
Denys Cherednychenko, a member of the board of founders of DEVIRO (manufacturer of Leleka and Leleka-100 UAVs), said that his company has gone through the entire difficult process of certifying its UAVs and training its operators, having received a certificate from the State Aviation Service of Ukraine. “Our cadets receive state-issued certificates that have all the necessary details, so our cadets receive an appropriate military specialty and a salary supplement… We now have more than 30 instructors who have official status and can teach the relevant program. We also accept civilians for training,” said a member of the DEVIRO founding board, noting that training one crew (three operators) of the Leleka-100 costs approximately 300 thousand hryvnias.
Nevertheless, Denys Cherednychenko noted, his company provides training for UAV operators free of charge, as the Ministry of Defense has no procedures that would allow the defense department to pay for this work. “Experts in the Ministry of Defense are aware of this issue, but they are severely limited by the existing regulatory framework, which does not allow private centers to receive state funding for training UAV operators,” said the DEVIRO representative.
Denys Cherednychenko drew attention to another problem: state training centers, including those of the Ministry of Defense, train UAV operators according to a shortened program and do not grant the status of an external UAV operator: “That is, cadets are students of courses that receive certificates that the Ministry of Defense itself does not recognize and does not provide after training in the relevant military accounting specialty.”
The DEVIRO founding board member believes that UAV manufacturers and private operator training centers should work closely with the Ministry of Defense to help defense experts make the necessary changes to the regulations governing the MoD.
“For each type of UAV, a corresponding state-approved educational program should be created, so we can talk about a full-fledged certification of operator training,” emphasized Denys Cherednychenko.
Vadym Ivchenko, MP and representative of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on National Security, Defense and Intelligence, emphasized that public-private partnership should be the most appropriate format for addressing the issue of UAV operator training. It should be noted that the relevant law was adopted in Ukraine in the summer of 2010.
At the same time, the MP agrees that the Ministry of Defense should now amend its own bylaws to have the right and opportunity to pay private entities for training UAV operators for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Vadym Ivchenko also believes that it is the UAV manufacturers who should offer the state a vision for the development of this segment of the military equipment market – a strategy for 10-15 years. At the same time, the MP believes that private UAV manufacturers should establish training centers.
Denys Cherednychenko agreed with this, but also reminded that the creation and operation of training centers requires considerable funds that could be used to improve drones. “For private companies to be interested and not afraid to invest in the creation of their training centers, the Ministry of Defense should create an appropriate regulatory framework,” said a member of the founding board of DEVIRO, urging fellow UAV manufacturers to obtain certificates from the State Aviation Service, as this facilitates a working dialogue with the Ministry of Defense.
Maksym Polyvianyi, Executive Director of NAUDI, reminded that many UAVs are being created in Ukraine, which are lethal weapons. “A private company will not be able to train operators of such drones without ammunition, a program to provide specially equipped training grounds… These issues cannot be resolved without the participation of the Ministry of Defense,” emphasized Maksym Polyvanyi.
He called on all private UAV manufacturers and private operator training schools to join the work on developing changes to the existing regulatory framework of the Ministry of Defense.
Anton Podlutskyi, the roundtable’s host, emphasized that all educational institutions in Ukraine are under the supervision of the Ministry of Education and Science, and there is not a single educational institution that is fully under the supervision of the Ministry of Defense. Therefore, the role of the Ministry of Education in the process of training UAV operators – from secondary schools to universities – is crucial.
In response, Maksym Polyvianyi noted that military universities still have programs approved by the Ministry of Defense. And, in his opinion, changes in educational programs are important, but these changes will not solve the current challenges now, but only after some time.
However, according to Militech CEO Nadiia Omelchenko, changes to educational programs are relevant. “We (the company’s representatives) participate in the team that prepares state professional standards for UAV operators. It involves not only private companies but also educational institutions. This is not happening very fast, but I think these standards will be announced in some time,” said Nadiia Omelchenko.
The issue of cooperation between private UAV manufacturers and training centers with local governments and military administrations was also discussed.
Anton Podlutsky, the host of the roundtable, emphasized that Kyiv, with its multibillion-dollar budget, is fully capable of launching a powerful drone production and training centers that will provide the Armed Forces with thousands of professionally trained UAV operators. As a reminder, the Kyiv City Military Administration (KCMA) is currently the main governing structure in the capital of Ukraine, and the head of the KCMA is the deputy head of the KCMA for civilian affairs.
Denys Cherednychenko said that his company has a positive experience in working with local governments and military administrations. “Everyone is happy to help – they provide places for training, help us communicate with law enforcement agencies, etc.”, said the member of the DEVIRO founding board.
Maksym Polyvianyi noted that some difficult issues can be resolved on the ground without additional budgetary funds if fruitful communication and cooperation with the military administration or local government is established.
According to Nadiia Omelchenko, local authorities are open to cooperation, but need very specific requests and proposals. Her colleague from Militech, Oksana Zakharchenko, emphasized that it is necessary to continue to increase the attention of the media, society and government to the training of UAV operators.
Armed Forces of Ukraine, KyivVlada, Maksym Polyvianyi, Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Nadiia Omelchenko, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Денис Чередниченко
On Sunday morning, Polish farmers ended their protest in front of the Medyka-Shehyni checkpoint, and truck traffic has resumed, the State Border Guard Service (SBGS) reports.
“According to the Border Guard of the Republic of Poland, today at 09:30 the protest in front of the Medyka-Shehyni checkpoint ended. Registration and crossing of trucks entering Ukraine is carried out as usual. Border guards, together with employees of the control services, are working to ensure the passage of the maximum number of trucks,” the message posted on the telegram channel reads.
On December 23, Vice Minister of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Poland Michal Kolodziejczak said that Polish farmers had suspended protests at the Shehyni-Medica checkpoint with Ukraine.
Medyka-Shehyni, Polish farmers, SBGS, State Border Guard Service
An earthquake with magnitude 4.0 (on the Richter scale) was registered on Sunday at 08.06 Kiev time in the area of Vrancea Mountains (Romania), it could be felt in Ukraine, but does not pose a threat to the population, the Main Center for Special Control reports.
“The source of the earthquake is located on the territory of Romania, in the area of Vrancea mountains, 110 km from the border with Ukraine, at a depth of 103 km. The earthquake does not carry a threat to the population of Ukraine. Fluctuations can be felt only by individuals who are quiet indoors, especially on the upper floors,” – said in a message published on the website.
The Main Control Center reminds that the last powerful earthquake from the area of Vrancea mountains was registered on December 04 this year with a magnitude of 4.6 (on the Richter scale).
The border between Ukraine and Poland will soon be unblocked: the Ministry of Community Development of Territories and Infrastructure (Ministry of Restoration) and the Ministry of Infrastructure of Poland have agreed on the action plan necessary for this, the Ministry of Restoration reported.
“Ministry of restoration together with the new leadership of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Poland agreed on a plan of action to unblock the border”, – stated in the message of the Ministry of restoration in Facebook following the results of the meeting of the Deputy Ministers Sergei Derkach and Yuriy Vaskov with the new Deputy Minister of Infrastructure of Poland Pawel Gantsazh on Friday.
It is indicated that the meeting was a continuation of agreements at the level of Deputy Prime Minister for Recovery – head of the Ministry of Recovery Alexander Kubrakov and Polish Minister of Infrastructure Dariusz Klimczak on December 20.
It is noted that the parties reached an understanding on compromise solutions and their implementation. The next stage – negotiations at the level of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Poland and the protesters. The issue of changes to the current Agreement on liberalization of freight transport is not discussed, stressed the Ministry.
“On the third day after the appointment welcomed in Kiev the new Deputy Minister of infrastructure Pawel Ganczaj. Together we finalized the action plan for unblocking the border. Agreed a protocol with a unified position of the ministries. About this meeting agreed on Wednesday Alexander Kubrakov and Polish Infrastructure Minister Dariusz Klimczak”, – wrote in Facebook on Friday Derkach.
According to him, the Ukrainian side “offered the things they are ready to do to unblock the checkpoints”. At the same time, the agreement on liberalization of freight traffic is fundamental and is not being discussed now, he stressed.
On Wednesday after the meeting between Klimczak and Kubrakov, Poland’s Ministry of Infrastructure said on its official website that its main topic was the protest of Polish carriers at the Polish-Ukrainian border.
“Together with the Ukrainian side, we must find a solution to the reasons for the ongoing protest and meet the expectations of entrepreneurs working in the field of freight transportation between Poland and Ukraine,” the statement quoted the Polish infrastructure minister as saying.
It was also reported that Klimczak handed Kubrakov the demands received from the protesters at the meeting in Lublin. In particular, they spoke about the need for the Ukrainian side to improve the mechanism of crossing the border by trucks that use the Ukrainian system of electronic queue, the exclusion of registration in this system of empty vehicles returning from Ukraine, the exclusion from this system of EU carriers, including Polish carriers, at the border crossing points specified by them. Alternatively, the principle of reciprocity may be introduced regarding the period of stay of EU vehicles in Ukraine and Ukrainian TCs in the EU.
The report said that Klimczak also emphasized the need to modify the agreement between the EU and Ukraine on road transportation of goods (“transport visa-free zone”), on the complete abolition of which the protesters initially insisted.
As reported, Polish carriers began the blockade of the checkpoints “Jahodyn – Dorohusk”, “Krakivets – Korczowa” and “Rawa Ruska – Hrebenne” on November 6, and on November 22, the protest was joined by the organization Oszukana Wieś, which blocked the checkpoint “Shehyni – Medyka”. Only empty vehicle checkpoints and low-tonnage vehicle checkpoints remained outside the blockade.
