The Ukrainian fintech market is entering a phase in which the automation of compliance, financial monitoring, and sanctions control is no longer a support function but rather a core component of a business’s financial resilience infrastructure.
This is discussed in a column by the CEO of AML.point, Oksana Gubina, an advisor on RegTech projects at AI FINTECH, for the Interfax-Ukraine news agency, prepared in the context of the Fintech Catalog UA 2026 presentation.
According to the catalog, there are over 300 fintech companies operating in Ukraine. A significant portion of them have already achieved operational self-sufficiency, nearly half are expanding their presence in international markets, and the majority continue to grow using their own resources.
The Fintech Catalog UA 2026 was prepared by the Ukrainian Association of Fintech and Innovative Companies with the support of the National Bank of Ukraine, IFC, SECO, and Sense Bank. The study was conducted in April–May 2026 among fintech companies, banks, and Ukrainian branches of international fintech companies, with 150 respondents participating.
According to Gubina, the Ukrainian fintech sector is developing in an environment where issues of transparency, risk management, and regulatory compliance are no longer secondary. Tighter sanctions controls, financial monitoring, and requirements for transparency regarding the origin of funds and ownership structure have made compliance one of the key elements of corporate resilience.
“Financial companies are increasingly viewing compliance not as external coercion by regulators, but as a tool for building trust, reputation, and long-term competitiveness. That is why investments in RegTech are increasingly seen not as expenses, but as investments in the company’s future stability,” she noted.
RegTech solutions are gradually shifting from the category of ancillary services to that of critical business infrastructure. For banks, financial companies, payment services, credit institutions, and other market participants, the automation of KYC, AML, and sanctions control is already a matter of operational speed, the quality of risk management, and the ability to meet regulatory requirements in near real time.
At the same time, the automation of financial monitoring is not limited to installing software. It requires the integration of various information systems, high-quality data, the establishment of reliable information processing workflows, change control, the preservation of decision histories, and a balance between customer convenience and compliance with regulatory requirements.
One of the emerging market trends is the convergence of ERP and RegTech. ERP systems are responsible for managing a company’s resources and operational processes, while RegTech handles regulatory compliance, financial monitoring, and risk control. However, both areas are increasingly working with large datasets, integrating into operational processes, and helping management make informed decisions.
In practice, this approach allows for the automation of counterparty risk assessments, KYC checks, sanctions screening, transaction monitoring, and the preparation of regulatory reports without placing an excessive burden on staff.
At the same time, according to Gubina, technology does not replace a compliance culture. Automation is effective only when a company has clear internal policies, high-quality data, accountable personnel, and a willingness to systematically manage risks. RegTech does not eliminate the role of the compliance officer but transforms it—shifting the focus from manual verification to managing processes, data, and risk models.
The further development of Ukrainian fintech will be largely driven by integration solutions in the areas of compliance, financial monitoring, and risk management. As requirements for business transparency, sanctions control, and regulatory reporting tighten, the role of RegTech will only grow.
For Ukrainian financial companies, automated compliance is gradually becoming not just an added advantage, but a basic standard for doing business. In the next stage of market development, companies that can combine technological capabilities, transparency, high-quality data, and systematic risk management will gain a competitive advantage.
Sources: Oksana Gubina’s column for “Interfax-Ukraine”, Fintech Catalog UA 2026, Ukrainian Association of Fintech and Innovative Companies.
President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky has made changes to the composition of the Council for Financial Stability of Ukraine, the website of the head of state has said.
In accordance with decree No. 60/2021 “On Amendments to the Regulations on the Financial Stability Council”, the Council includes the Deputy Head of the President’s Office, which is responsible for economic policy issues, as well as another Deputy Head of the National Bank of Ukraine (previously there was one deputy) who take part in its work on a voluntary basis.
Also, according to the new amendments, from now on, a meeting of the Council will be legally qualified if at least six members of the Council are present, including at least one representative from the National Bank of Ukraine and the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine.
In addition, decisions of the Council will be made by a qualified majority of votes of the members of the Council present at the meeting (at least five votes – if six members of the Council take part in the meeting, or at least six votes – if seven or eight members of the Council participate in the meeting).
It is noted that the decree comes into force on the day of its publication.
Financial stability in Ukraine will be kept even if the second wave of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) begins, and all major banks in the country will be able to survive it, Board Chairman of Raiffeisen Bank Aval Oleksandr Pysaruk has said.
“All major banks – systemic, large, medium – I am sure they will survive… Some of the small banks may suffer, but it will not affect anything… I don’t see any threat to financial stability,” he said in interview with Interfax-Ukraine.
According to Pysaruk, after the work that the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) did to reform the banking sector, fairly stable banks have remained on the market.
“The Ukrainian banking system, like Ukraine as a whole, from the point of view of macroeconomic indicators has entered this crisis in better condition than at any moment in the past 30 years since independence… Largely thanks to the work of the NBU and the Ministry of Finance, by the way, with the IMF support,” he said.
He said that, according to the NBU Financial Stability Report, nine banks in the country may need additional capitalization, and two of them are state-owned. “Two well-known state-owned banks, which often lack capital, because their management quality is not good enough, the story is complicated. If they do not have enough capital again, the state will contribute it again,” he said.