The European Commission is developing a new legislative framework that will allow national, regional, and municipal authorities to restrict short-term housing rentals in areas facing particularly sharp price increases and a shortage of apartments for permanent residents.
The initiative will be part of the future European Affordable Housing Act, which the European Commission plans to present in 2026. The document is intended to help authorities identify areas under housing pressure based on publicly available statistical data and take measures commensurate with the scale of the problem.
This does not mean a blanket ban on Airbnb, Booking.com, or other services across the entire European Union. The European Commission intends to create a legal framework within which cities and regions can independently regulate short-term rentals without violating the rules of the single European market.
In particular, municipalities should be given greater legal certainty when imposing restrictions in areas where tourist rentals reduce the housing supply for local residents. Possible measures will be determined taking into account the local situation, the interests of the tourism sector, and the principle of proportionality.
During the consultations, representatives of cities and regions called on the European Commission to develop a list of tools compatible with EU legislation. They also emphasized the need to take into account the differences between major tourist centers, small towns, and rural areas.
The drafting of the Affordable Housing Act is proceeding in parallel with the implementation of previously approved EU rules on the collection of information regarding short-term rentals. EU Regulation No. 2024/1028 will take effect on May 20, 2026. It provides for the creation of digital registration systems for landlords and the exchange of data between platforms and government agencies.
In countries that implement such registration, property owners must obtain a unique property number and include it in their listings. Online platforms are required to display and verify these numbers, conduct random checks, and remove listings at the request of authorities if they do not comply with established rules.
Platforms must also submit monthly data on the number of guests and booked nights via a single national digital gateway. This will allow municipalities to assess the actual scale of short-term rentals and make data-driven decisions.
However, the current regulation primarily governs registration and the exchange of information. It does not, in and of itself, establish EU-wide limits on the number of apartments available for rent or the permitted number of nights.
According to the European Commission, short-term rentals already account for about a quarter of all tourist accommodation supply in the EU.
In 2025, 951.6 million guest nights were booked through Airbnb, Booking.com, Expedia, and other major online platforms. Compared to 2024, this figure increased by 11.4%.
The European Commission acknowledges that this market generates income for property owners, expands options for tourists, and supports local businesses. At the same time, the high concentration of short-term rentals in historic centers and popular resorts may reduce the supply of apartments for permanent residence and contribute to rising prices.
According to the European Affordable Housing Plan, the number of short-term rental bookings through the largest platforms increased by more than 90% between 2018 and 2024. Professional operators account for more than 45% of listings, even though they represent a minority of property owners.
Once the new legislation is adopted, the rules will depend not only on the country but also on the situation in a specific city or district. In tourist destinations with a housing shortage, local authorities will potentially be able to impose stricter requirements regarding registration, licensing, and rental duration. In regions where there is a shortage of tourist accommodations and short-term rentals support the local economy, restrictions may be significantly fewer.
In 2025, Ukraine remained the fifth-largest supplier of organic products to the EU, although its export volume decreased by 14.3%—from 203,897 thousand to 174,701 thousand metric tons. Ukraine’s share of the EU’s total organic imports was 5.9%.
The largest suppliers were Ecuador with 434,970 thousand metric tons, China with 314,404 thousand metric tons, Peru with 220,333 thousand metric tons, and the Dominican Republic with 177,642 thousand metric tons. Ukraine ranked behind them.
Ukraine retained its top position in organic grain exports. In 2025, the EU imported 85,859 thousand metric tons of such products from Ukraine, accounting for 27.7% of European imports in this category.
In terms of oilseeds and protein crops, Ukraine ranked third behind China and Togo, supplying 48,828 thousand metric tons. Exports of organic fruits and nuts totaled 20,250 thousand metric tons, placing Ukraine in ninth place.
Ukrainian pharmaceutical manufacturers expect the government to facilitate the launch of tools for 2D verification of medicines in Ukraine.
As Petro Bagriy, president of the Association of Ukrainian Drug Manufacturers (AULU), told the “Interfax-Ukraine” news agency, this specifically involves facilitating pharmaceutical manufacturers’ access to software that will allow them to verify pharmaceutical products using a 2D code compatible with European systems, as well as the introduction of certain tax incentives for the purchase of the necessary equipment.
Bagriy noted that these issues were discussed during the most recent working meeting of members of the newly established “National Organization for the Verification of Medicines” (NOVLM).
“There is a provision in the new law on medicines stipulating that 2D coding of medicines must be operational in Ukraine by 2028. Such verification is one of the tools for combating counterfeit medicines. Ukraine is integrating into the EU, where this is a mandatory requirement, as only medicines verified by a 2D code are permitted for sale within the EU. Moreover, when exporting their medicines, Ukrainian pharmaceutical manufacturers label their products with 2D codes. But this is expensive; it requires significant investment in equipment and the renovation of packaging facilities,” he said.
The president of the Association of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers of Ukraine (AVLU) believes that not only pharmaceutical manufacturers but also distributors, pharmacies, and healthcare facilities that purchase medicines should participate in the launch of the system.
“We want to build a completely transparent system that will fully satisfy all participants, discriminate against no one, and provide equal rights and opportunities. In addition, it is important for the system to be fully integrated into the EU. We are discussing the possibility of engaging a software developer who will support the 2D verification—specifically, the one who developed it for EU countries—so that our product is fully integrated into all EU markets,” he emphasized.
Bagriy noted that, as a result, the QR codes used in Ukraine will be accepted in Europe, which will help promote Ukrainian medicines in European markets and also simplify the circulation of imported medicines in Ukraine.
“For example, ‘Farmaka,’ which will apply its code to its products, will find it easier to sell them in European pharmacies, and ‘Sanofi’ products will be easier to verify in Ukraine,” explained the president of the AULU.
He noted that “there is an initiative to exempt equipment imported for the implementation of the 2D-coding program for medicines from import duties and VAT.”
In addition, Bagriy reported that the Ministry of Health “is helping to negotiate a preferential price for the software in order to facilitate the financing of this project.”
“We have made a request, and the Minister of Health has promised us support so that we can gain access to software that has already been developed in the EU and be able to use it at a discounted price,” he said.
The president of the Association of Pharmaceutical Companies of Ukraine noted that the pilot system is scheduled to launch on January 1, 2027, and the system is expected to be fully operational as of January 1, 2028.
As previously reported, five pharmaceutical industry associations have registered the “National Organization for the Verification of Medicines” (NOVLM) to prevent and combat the circulation of counterfeit medicines in Ukraine in cooperation with European counterparts and the European Organization for the Verification of Medicines.
According to the “Serbian Economist,” Serbia’s lack of progress in its EU accession negotiations could create additional challenges for Ukraine and Moldova, as some EU countries are insisting on maintaining a geographical balance between candidates from Eastern Europe and the Western Balkans.
Euronews reports this, citing EU diplomats.
Ukraine has opened two of the six negotiation clusters in recent weeks, but further acceleration of the process may face demands to simultaneously advance Serbia’s application.
“Progress in one direction creates pressure to move forward in the other as well,” one European diplomat told Euronews.
In early July, the European Commission once again recommended opening Cluster 3—dedicated to competitiveness and inclusive growth—for Serbia. Negotiations regarding Serbia have effectively remained stalled since December 2021.
However, eight EU member states opposed opening the chapter: the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Belgium, Estonia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, and Croatia. Denmark, Luxembourg, and Latvia are also not yet ready to support this decision. The consent of all 27 EU member states is required to open a negotiation chapter.
Opponents of Serbia’s advancement point to Belgrade’s insufficient progress in the areas of the rule of law, judicial independence, and democratic standards. Another reason is Serbia’s refusal to join the EU’s sanctions against Russia.
The European Commission, on the other hand, believes that Belgrade has implemented some of the recommendations, repealed controversial changes to judicial legislation, improved cooperation with the EU on foreign policy, and strengthened ties with Ukraine. At the same time, Brussels acknowledges that Serbia needs to continue reforming its judicial and prosecutorial systems.
France, Spain, and a group of countries calling themselves the “Friends of the Western Balkans” advocate for preserving Serbia’s membership prospects. They fear that Ukraine’s rapid progress against the backdrop of Belgrade’s prolonged stagnation will be perceived as the application of double standards.
Euronews emphasizes that the negotiation processes for Ukraine and Serbia have not yet been formally merged. However, as Kyiv and Chisinau push to open the remaining clusters by the end of the year, demands for equal treatment of the candidate countries may intensify.
In response to the recent fines imposed by the European Union on the American tech companies Apple, Google, and Amazon, U.S. President Donald Trump called the move “discrimination” and promised additional investigations and tariffs.
“The European Union is at it again and, as always, has targeted major American companies directly! After fining Apple $15 billion, Meta $3 billion, Amazon $2.5 billion, and many others for no reason at all, we have just been informed that Google—a truly cutting-edge and amazing company—has been fined another $1 billion without any explanation,” he wrote on the social media platform Truth Social.
Trump emphasized that the total amount of fines imposed on Google exceeded $18 billion.
“This illegal and highly discriminatory practice began at such high levels during the first year of Joe Biden’s administration, but it will not continue under a Trump administration,” he stressed.
Trump noted that the U.S. “will immediately launch a Section 301 investigation into the practice of ‘robbing’ American companies and, as a result, American taxpayers.”
The U.S. president promised a “very high price” for the European Union for “this illegal and highly unethical behavior.”
“The fines will be completely rescinded, and we expect a substantial tariff to be imposed on them as soon as possible,” Trump promised.
As reported, the European Commission (EC) announced on Thursday its decision to impose a fine of 890 million euros on Google for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA).
Source: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116976043318889040
The European Union has established a legal framework allowing member states to sell Russian oil that was previously seized and confiscated in the course of cracking down on sanctions evasion.
The relevant provision is included in EU Council Regulation No. 2026/1848 of July 23, 2026, which formalized the 21st package of sanctions against Russia. The document states the need to enable national competent authorities to safely dispose of shipments of Russian oil that they seize and confiscate. Disposing of the cargo may include selling it to third parties.
However, the new provision does not grant EU authorities the automatic right to stop any tanker simply because it is transporting oil of Russian origin. First, the state must have legal grounds to detain the vessel and confiscate the cargo—for example, a violation of the sanctions regime, the absence of a valid flag, the provision of false documents, or other violations of European, national, or international law.
The new regulation primarily specifies what authorities may do with the cargo after its lawful confiscation. Once the confiscation procedure is complete, the former owner does not automatically receive the right to the proceeds from the sale of the cargo. However, the regulation does not establish a uniform procedure for distributing the proceeds across all EU countries, nor does it provide for their automatic transfer to Ukraine. Such decisions will depend on national legislation and the specific case.
According to Euractiv, the measure is primarily aimed at cargo from vessels used to circumvent EU oil sanctions. The option to sell the cargo is intended to address a practical problem: confiscated oil must be unloaded, stored, and safely sold, which entails significant costs and environmental risks.
The mechanism is part of the 21st EU sanctions package, adopted on July 23. The package also increases pressure on the Russian oil sector, traders, and the shadow fleet, and suspends the automatic review of the price cap on Russian oil until July 15, 2027.
In practice, the new rule may make it easier for EU member states to take action against vessels suspected of circumventing sanctions. However, each detention and confiscation must have a separate legal basis, and the owners of the vessels and cargo will be able to challenge such decisions in national and international courts.
