The Ukrainian Renewable Energy Association (UREA) supports the revision of electricity transmission tariffs for NPC “Ukrenergo” and proposes simultaneously launching the practical implementation of a mechanism to protect vulnerable electricity consumers and accelerating the introduction of targeted monetary support for the population.
This is stated in the association’s official letter addressed to the National Commission for State Regulation of Energy and Public Utilities (NEURC) and the Ministry of Energy of Ukraine, published on Facebook.
“The UAVE emphasizes: the discussion should not be limited solely to the tariff rate. A comprehensive solution is needed—a financially sound tariff must be combined with a gradual reduction of cross-subsidization and the launch of targeted monetary support for vulnerable consumers,” the association stressed.
The UAVE also considers it necessary to work with the Ministry of Social Policy, Ukrenergo, distribution system operators (DSOs), and other stakeholders to develop a data-sharing mechanism for launching targeted monetization of subsidies.
The association asserts that this approach will help maintain the financial stability of the energy sector, preserve social protection for the population, and reduce distortions in the electricity market. The transition to targeted support also aligns with Ukraine’s commitments regarding market liberalization to the EU, the IMF, and other international partners.
In turn, as stated in the association’s appeal to the NEURC and the Ministry of Energy, the UEA supports Ukrenergo’s position on the electricity transmission tariff, as the financial stability of the transmission system operator (TSO) is critical for the reliable operation of the power system, the fulfillment of special obligations, stable settlements between market participants, and the restoration of energy infrastructure.
The association cited Ukrenergo data, according to which the projected volume of electricity transmission in 2026 will be approximately 89.6 million MWh, which is significantly lower than the figure used when setting the current tariff. At the same time, costs to cover transmission losses have increased, the configuration of power grids is changing, and the volumes of electricity imports and long-distance transmission are growing—a situation that, against the backdrop of ongoing damage to energy infrastructure, requires significant financial investment.
“Trends such as the accumulation of debt among market participants, deteriorating payment discipline, reduced opportunities for the restoration and development of grid infrastructure, and a decline in the investment attractiveness of the energy sector—all in the absence of a source to cover the TSO’s costs—will intensify,” the UAVE emphasized.
At the same time, as the association noted, amid systematic attacks on energy infrastructure, the development of distributed generation, renewable energy sources (RES), and energy storage systems has become one of the key elements of energy security, as these facilities provide additional stability to the power system, increase its flexibility and maneuverability, and reduce the risk of shortages.
“Therefore, ensuring timely and predictable payments to renewable energy producers is not only a matter of fulfilling financial obligations but also a crucial factor in the further development of Ukraine’s energy resilience,” the UAVE concluded.
As reported, the NEURC proposes setting the tariff for NPC “Ukrenergo” for electricity transmission at 903.53 UAH/MWh (excluding VAT) effective July 1, 2026, which is 21.62% higher than the current rate.
It is noted that the updated tariff component for Ukrenergo’s special obligations regarding payment for electricity from alternative sources amounts to 367.56 UAH/MWh within the transmission tariff structure.
Accordingly, it is proposed to increase the dispatch tariff by 7.83% to 118.64 UAH/MWh.
Ukraine’s export logistics entered 2026 in a new configuration, where Ukrzaliznytsia’s transition to a fixed tariff for grain car rental reduced cost volatility, according to the information and analytical agency UkrAgroConsult.
According to analysts, the main cargo flows are currently concentrated in the direction of the ports of Greater Odessa, where terminal utilization has stabilized at 50%. In early February, the number of grain cars heading for ports exceeded 9,000 units, which is associated with the active fulfillment of contracts and the need for working capital for farmers before spring field work.
“The dynamics of grain car traffic demonstrates continued pressure on infrastructure capacity. This situation indicates a resumption of activity by exporters, but at the same time leaves minimal margin for the logistics system,” experts noted.
The agency noted a shift in the competitive balance between modes of transport: railways retain a key role in mass shipments, while road transport is increasing its share due to faster turnover.
“This model of coexistence will become a long-term reality for Ukrainian exports,” UkrAgroConsult predicts.
EXPORTS, GRAIN, LOGISTICS, RAILWAYS, ROAD TRANSPORT, TARIFFS, УЗ
US President Donald Trump announced his intention to raise tariffs on a number of goods from South Korea from 15% to 25%, linking this decision to the fact that, according to him, the country’s parliament had failed to fulfill its obligations under a previously agreed trade agreement. According to Reuters, Trump wrote on social media that the increased rates would apply to South Korean cars, lumber, pharmaceuticals, and other goods subject to “reciprocal tariffs.” However, the report did not specify when the increase would take effect.
The South Korean authorities were taken by surprise by the announcement and declared their commitment to implementing the agreements; emergency consultations were held in Seoul, and relevant officials are preparing to contact the American side.
Against the backdrop of the news, South Korea’s KOSPI index fell during trading, then reversed and closed higher, while the won weakened. Hyundai Motor and Kia shares ended the session lower after a more noticeable decline during the day.
We remind you that under the agreement reached in 2025, the tariff on imports of Korean cars and auto components to the US was previously reduced to 15% from 25% and came into effect on November 1
IMPORTS, SOUTH KOREA, TARIFFS, TRUMP, US
US President Donald Trump has announced the introduction of 10% tariffs against Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland from February 1, Clash Report reports.
“Starting February 1, 2026, all of the above countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland) will be subject to a 10% tariff on all goods shipped to the United States of America. On June 1, 2026, the tariff will be increased to 25%,” he wrote on the social network Truth Social.
Trump noted that these countries are directly opposing US attempts to take over Greenland.
“These tariffs will be assessed and payable until an agreement is reached on the complete and absolute purchase of Greenland,” he added.
Beijing urges Washington to adhere to previously reached consensuses and considers President Donald Trump’s threats of new tariffs a mistake, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said.
“China urges the United States to immediately reconsider its mistaken actions, adhere to the important consensuses reached during telephone conversations between the two heads of state, safeguard the hard-won results of consultations, and continue to use the mechanism of China–US trade and economic consultations,” the statement published on the ministry’s website said.
Beijing emphasized that it stands for resolving differences through dialogue, and if Washington insists “on the wrong path,” China will take measures to protect its legitimate rights and interests.
“Deliberate threats of high tariffs are the wrong way to build relations with China,” the ministry stressed. The agency also noted that US statements about possible new tariffs are an example of double standards.
On Saturday night, Trump announced that he intends, starting November 1, “or maybe even earlier,” to impose additional 100% tariffs on goods imported from China.
“Starting November 1, or perhaps earlier, depending on China’s actions, the United States will impose 100% tariffs in addition to the existing ones. In addition, starting November 1, we will implement export control measures for any vital software,” he wrote on Truth Social.
Trump explained that he made this decision because China “declared that starting November 1 it would implement serious export control measures on almost all products manufactured in the PRC.” “This will affect all countries and is clearly a plan that China has been preparing for years,” the US president said.
US President Donald Trump has announced that from November 1, 2025, additional 100% tariffs will come into effect on Chinese imports, which will be in addition to existing tariffs.
According to him, this decision was made in response to China’s recent export restrictions on rare earth metals and other critical materials.
According to a quick analysis by the Experts Club think tank, the possible consequences for the global economy could be as follows:
1) China is likely to respond with countermeasures: the introduction of tariffs, export restrictions, or lawsuits (including through the WTO).
2) The escalation of the trade conflict could trigger a chain reaction — countries dependent on China or the US may begin to “pull” supply chains.
3) The rise in the price of Chinese components will hit electronics, automotive, and equipment manufacturing, leading to higher prices for end products.
4) Companies will be forced to look for alternative suppliers, probably in Asia (Vietnam, India) or Latin America, which will increase logistics costs.
5) Increased instability could exacerbate capital flight to safe havens — the dollar, gold — and devalue the currencies of countries that trade actively with China.
6) Shares of technology companies that depend on Chinese components will come under pressure.
Many emerging markets depend on Chinese imports. Tariff increases will lead to inflationary pressure and a deterioration in the trade balance. Geopolitical alliances may also strengthen: countries may choose between the US and China, adjusting their foreign economic policies.
There may be leaks and problems in the implementation of measures. Administrative and customs burdens may increase the cost of complying with rules of origin, and it is clear that some companies will try to circumvent tariffs through “transit” countries.
