According to Experts.news, Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s government has presented a package of 34 reforms designed to restore competitiveness to Europe’s largest economy following several years of weak growth, high energy costs, a slowdown in industrial development, and pressure on the export model.
According to Reuters, key measures cover pensions, taxes, the labor market, industrial policy, energy, infrastructure, housing, trade protection, and reducing bureaucracy. The government expects to pass the main elements of the package in parliament by the end of 2026.
One of the central components is tax relief for households amounting to approximately 10 billion euros per year. For a working family with two children, the benefit could exceed 600 euros thanks to increased tax deductions and a flatter tax rate for middle-income earners. This is planned to be partially financed by raising the top income tax rate from 45% to 47% for the highest earners—those earning 280,000 euros or more per year.
They also aim to make the labor market more flexible. Measures include eliminating the option to report sick by phone, requiring a doctor’s note from the first day of illness, extending the duration of fixed-term contracts to 48 months for new employees by 2030, and introducing more flexible severance pay mechanisms for high-earning employees.
The industrial sector is focused on supporting the automotive industry, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, mechanical engineering, clean technologies, batteries, semiconductors, and artificial intelligence. There are also plans to expand the Deutschlandfonds investment mechanism, accelerate the connection of industrial facilities to power grids, and cut the implementation time for grid projects by roughly half.
For Germany, this is an attempt to address several systemic problems at once. In its May forecast, the European Commission noted that after two years of recession and growth of only 0.2% in 2025, the German economy may grow by only 0.6% in 2026 and 0.9% in 2027. Among the reasons cited for this weakness were high energy costs, weak exports, competition from China, tariff risks, and a delay in the recovery of investment.
The package could give Germany new momentum, but it will not be a quick fix. According to economists’ estimates cited by Reuters, provided the reform is fully and swiftly implemented, the long-term economic growth rate could be raised from approximately 0.4% to 0.7% per year. This is an improvement, but not a return to the old model of strong industrial growth.
The main impact on the German economy could manifest through three channels: a reduction in administrative costs for businesses, an increase in domestic demand driven by tax breaks, and accelerated investment in infrastructure, energy, and technology sectors. But the weak spot remains the same—Germany depends on exports and global industrial supply chains, which are currently under pressure from geopolitics, tariffs, and competition from China.
The consequences will vary for Germany’s major trading partners. In 2025, China once again became Germany’s largest trading partner, with a trade volume of 251.8 billion euros. The United States ranked second with 240.5 billion euros, and the Netherlands ranked third with 209.1 billion euros. At the same time, the U.S. remained the main market for German exports, although shipments of automobiles, trailers, and semi-trailers to the U.S. fell by 17.8%.
For China, Germany’s reforms mean intensified competition in industry, particularly in the electric vehicle, battery, mechanical engineering, and clean tech sectors. Berlin has separately stated its intention to strengthen the EU’s anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures and to consider technology transfer requirements in strategic sectors for non-European investments. This could make German-Chinese economic relations more strained.
For the U.S., the effect is twofold. On the one hand, a stronger Germany means greater demand for American technology, energy, financial services, and industrial equipment. On the other hand, Germany will seek to preserve its own industrial base and reduce its dependence on foreign suppliers in strategic sectors, particularly in semiconductors, batteries, and artificial intelligence infrastructure.
For the Netherlands and other EU countries, the reform package is likely to be positive. If German industry and consumption begin to recover, European logistics hubs, component suppliers, machine-building companies, chemical manufacturers, and countries integrated into German production chains will benefit.
The main risks of the reforms are political and time-related. Some of the measures may face resistance from labor unions, the medical community, and regional authorities, and the economic impact will not be immediate. Reuters notes that businesses and economists generally welcomed the package as necessary but emphasized that everything will depend on the speed and quality of its implementation.
Ultimately, the Merz package can be seen as an attempt to reshape the German growth model: less bureaucracy, more investment, greater labor market flexibility, and stronger protection for strategic industries. But Germany will not be able to return to its former role as Europe’s economic engine through this single reform package alone. To do so, it will have to simultaneously address the challenges of high energy costs, demographic shifts, technological lag, weak domestic demand, and dependence on foreign markets.
On July 4, the United States marks the 250th anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration of Independence — the key document that began the formation of the American state. The central events are taking place in Washington, where the anniversary is combined with the traditional Independence Day and the federal America250/Freedom 250 program.
The National Mall in Washington has become the main venue for the celebration. Under the Freedom 250 program, the day will feature the Great American State Fair, FIFA Fan Zone, aviation demonstrations and flyovers above the center of the capital, an evening concert program, an address by US President Donald Trump, and a major fireworks display. Organizers said the fireworks show is expected to be the largest in history and begin at 10:30 p.m. local time.
The anniversary is not taking place without adjustments. Because of extreme heat in Washington, organizers moved some activities to a later time, expanded cooling points, water stations, and medical support. The National Independence Day Parade, which was supposed to take place on July 4, was canceled because of an excessive heat warning.
Events are also taking place in other US cities. Associated Press notes that the celebration includes fireworks, concerts, and public ceremonies in Washington, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and other cities, while the anniversary is taking place against the backdrop of political polarization and debates about the country’s future.
“The 250th anniversary of the United States is not only a historic date, but also an occasion to assess the balance of strength and vulnerability of the world’s largest economy. America retains first place in nominal GDP, military spending, the depth of its financial market, the role of the dollar, and its energy base, but at the same time enters the anniversary year with debt of almost $39.4 trillion. For the global economy, this means that the United States remains the main center of power, but its fiscal sustainability is becoming one of the key risks of the next decade,” said Maksym Urakin, founder of the Experts Club analytical center.
Historically, Independence Day is associated with the decision of the 13 American colonies to sever political ties with Great Britain. The Declaration of Independence was adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776. Formal international legal recognition of US independence by Great Britain came later — under the Treaty of Paris of 1783, which ended the War of Independence.
Today, the United States remains a federal presidential republic consisting of 50 states and the federal District of Columbia. The country’s population, according to the IMF estimate, is about 343 million people, while nominal GDP in 2026 is estimated at approximately $32.38 trillion, preserving the United States’ status as the world’s largest economy at current prices.
The United States also retains several leading global positions. According to SIPRI, the country remains the world’s largest military spender: in 2025, US spending amounted to $954 billion, or about one-third of global military expenditure. According to the EIA, the United States set a new oil production record in 2025 — 13.6 million barrels per day — remaining the world’s largest oil producer. The US dollar, according to IMF COFER, accounted for 57.13% of allocated global foreign exchange reserves in the first quarter of 2026, remaining the world’s leading reserve currency.
The American financial market also remains the largest center of global capital. According to the World Federation of Exchanges, the two largest US exchanges alone — Nasdaq and NYSE — each had tens of trillions of dollars in domestic market capitalization at the end of 2025, significantly ahead of most global exchanges.
The main weak point of the United States in the anniversary year is the national debt. According to the US Treasury, as of July 2, 2026, total federal debt stood at $39.375 trillion, of which $31.679 trillion was debt held by the public.
The US Congressional Budget Office forecasts that the federal deficit in fiscal year 2026 will amount to $1.9 trillion, or 5.8% of GDP. Debt held by the public, according to the CBO estimate, will reach 101% of GDP by the end of 2026 and rise to 120% of GDP by 2036.
Thus, the United States enters its 250th anniversary as a country with a unique combination of global leadership and internal imbalances. The American economy remains the largest in the world, the dollar is the key currency of the international system, and the capital market is the main source of liquidity. But the scale of the debt and chronic budget deficits are increasingly becoming factors that investors, US allies, and competitors take into account no less than the country’s technological, military, and financial power.
The article presents key macroeconomic indicators of Ukraine and the global economy as of the end of March 2026. The analysis was prepared on the basis of current data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine (SSSU), the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, as well as leading national statistical agencies (Eurostat, BEA, NBS, ONS, TurkStat, IBGE). Maksym Urakin, PhD in Economics and founder of the Experts Club information and analytical center, presented an overview of current macroeconomic trends that determined the situation in Ukraine and the world at the beginning of 2026.
Macroeconomic indicators of Ukraine
As of the end of March 2026, the Ukrainian economy remained in a mode of managed macrofinancial stabilization, but the first quarter showed a noticeable deterioration in the balance of risks compared with the beginning of the year. After a relatively favorable January, when inflation was declining, reserves were at a historically high level, and the NBU began cautious easing of interest rate policy, the situation became more complicated in February-March. Inflation accelerated again, international reserves declined for the second month in a row, the foreign exchange market required significant interventions by the regulator, and the first quarterly GDP estimate showed a decline.
According to the preliminary estimate of the State Statistics Service, Ukraine’s real GDP in Q1 2026 decreased by 0.6% compared with Q1 2025, and by 0.7% compared with the previous quarter, taking into account the seasonal factor. Nominal GDP amounted to UAH 2,047.2 billion. This became an important signal that economic recovery remains unstable and highly sensitive to energy, military and foreign trade shocks.
In its April Inflation Report, the National Bank worsened its forecast for Ukraine’s real GDP growth in 2026 to 1.3%, taking into account further destruction of infrastructure, larger electricity deficits and the effects of a significant increase in energy prices. This means that even if international support is maintained and the situation on the foreign exchange market remains controlled, the economy is entering 2026 on a lower growth trajectory than previously expected.
“The first quarter of 2026 showed that the Ukrainian economy has still not moved into a classic recovery phase. We have a stabilization model that works thanks to international financial support, budget expenditures, business adaptation and NBU policy. But the decline in GDP in the first quarter indicates that the margin of safety remains limited. Energy destruction, labor shortages, weak exports and military risks are quickly affecting the real sector. Therefore, the main task for 2026 is to gradually restore the productive base of the economy,” Urakin noted.
Inflation dynamics in March also became less favorable. According to the State Statistics Service, as commented on by the NBU, consumer inflation accelerated to 7.9% year-on-year in March 2026. Month-on-month, prices rose by 1.7%. After the January slowdown to 7.4% and the February acceleration to 7.6%, the March figure confirmed that the disinflationary trend had become less stable.
The NBU explained the March acceleration primarily by the increase in prices for raw food products, fuel and certain services. Additional pressure was created by energy risks, rising business costs, the impact of external energy prices and increasing geopolitical tension. At the same time, core inflation remained closer to the forecast trajectory, which allowed the regulator not to move to a sharp tightening of policy, but at the same time limited the room for a further rapid reduction in the rate.
At the end of March, the NBU key policy rate remained at 15.0%. On March 20, the Board of the National Bank decided to keep it unchanged after the January reduction from 15.5% to 15.0%. The regulator explained this by the need to maintain the attractiveness of hryvnia assets, preserve the stability of the foreign exchange market and control inflation expectations.
“March effectively paused the discussion about rapid monetary policy easing. Inflation accelerated, the foreign exchange market remained tense, and external risks increased. Under such conditions, keeping the rate at 15% was a logical decision. Ukraine cannot afford to stimulate the economy at the cost of losing confidence in the hryvnia. In a wartime economy, the stability of expectations is often more important than a short-term reduction in the cost of credit,” Urakin emphasized.
The foreign exchange sector remained controlled but required significant support from the NBU. As of April 1, 2026, Ukraine’s international reserves amounted to almost $52.0 billion. In March, they decreased by 5.0%. This dynamic was caused by the National Bank’s foreign exchange interventions and the country’s debt payments in foreign currency, which were only partially compensated by inflows from international partners and the placement of foreign currency domestic government bonds.
Despite the decline, reserves remained high by historical standards and continued to serve as the main financial safety cushion. At the same time, the very need for large interventions indicated that the private foreign exchange market continued to have a structural currency deficit. Ukraine imports significantly more than it exports, and therefore exchange rate stability is largely supported by external financing and the NBU’s reserves.
Foreign trade in the first quarter confirmed this problem. According to the State Customs Service, Ukraine’s trade turnover in January-March 2026 amounted to $33.5 billion. Imports reached $23.4 billion, while exports amounted to $10.1 billion. Thus, the goods deficit over three months amounted to about $13.3 billion, and imports were more than twice as high as exports.
In the import structure, machinery, equipment, transport, fuel and energy goods, and chemical industry products played a key role. China, Poland and Turkey remained the largest import trading partners. The export base remained significantly narrower: the main positions were food products, agricultural products, metals and certain machinery products. The main export destinations remained EU countries and Turkey.
“The trade deficit of the first quarter is one of the most important indicators of the vulnerability of the Ukrainian economy. Reserves and external assistance make it possible to pass through this period without a currency crisis, but they do not replace the country’s own export capacity. When imports are more than twice as high as exports, it means that the country is financing a significant part of its needs through external resources. In wartime conditions this is inevitable, but strategically such a model cannot be permanent. Ukraine must increase exports of products with higher added value, develop processing, logistics, energy autonomy and the defense-industrial complex,” Urakin stressed.
The budget situation following the results of the first quarter also remained tense. According to the Ministry of Finance, UAH 734.6 billion was received by the general fund of the state budget in January-March 2026. At the same time, cash expenditures of the general fund for this period amounted to UAH 916.4 billion, which is 7.1% more than in the corresponding period of the previous year. In March, expenditures amounted to UAH 369.1 billion.
Expenditures on security and defense in January-March amounted to UAH 570.9 billion, or 62.3% of all expenditures of the general fund. This confirms that the state budget in 2026 remains primarily a war budget. The largest areas of expenditure included remuneration in the budget sector with accruals, social security, subsidies and transfers to enterprises, payment for goods and services, servicing of public debt and transfers to local budgets.
“The budget of the first quarter of 2026 shows that the state maintains financial manageability, but the price of this manageability is very high. More than 60% of general fund expenditures are directed to security and defense, and this is absolutely understandable in wartime conditions. But such a structure means that the room for classic investment in development is limited. Therefore, international support, the domestic government bond market and the government’s ability to expand its own tax base through the restoration of economic activity remain critically important,” Urakin noted.
Global economy
As of the end of March 2026, the global economy remained resilient, but less predictable than at the beginning of the year. While in January the IMF’s baseline scenario projected global economic growth of 3.3% in 2026, in the April World Economic Outlook the Fund revised its estimates amid new geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Under the baseline assumption of a limited conflict, the IMF forecast global growth of 3.1% in 2026 and 3.2% in 2027.
The IMF noted that the global economy had once again faced a shock related to war, rising commodity prices, stronger inflation expectations and tighter financial conditions. This meant that the global environment for Ukraine became less favorable: energy prices, risks to trade and the cost of capital again began to play a greater role.
The United States remained one of the main centers of global resilience. In the first quarter of 2026, U.S. real GDP grew by 2.1% year-on-year, according to the BEA estimate. Growth was supported by investment, exports, government spending and consumer spending. At the same time, inflation in the United States accelerated noticeably in March: the consumer price index rose by 3.3% year-on-year after 2.4% in February, while core CPI stood at 2.6%.
The Federal Reserve in March kept the target range for the federal funds rate at 3.5–3.75%. This meant that U.S. monetary policy remained restrictive, while expectations of a rapid rate cut were postponed. For countries with elevated risk, including Ukraine, this meant the preservation of a relatively high cost of global capital.
The eurozone was in a more difficult position. Its economic growth remained weak, while inflation again rose above the ECB’s target. According to Eurostat’s preliminary estimate, annual inflation in the eurozone in March 2026 stood at 2.5%, while the final estimate later showed 2.6%. In February, the figure was 1.9%, meaning that March brought a noticeable acceleration of price pressure. The main factor was energy, while core inflation remained more moderate.
The European Central Bank in March kept key rates unchanged: the deposit rate at 2.0%, the main refinancing operations rate at 2.15%, and the marginal lending facility rate at 2.40%. For Ukraine, the eurozone remains the most important external economic environment due to trade, financial assistance, EU integration, migration flows and logistics corridors. However, the weak growth rate in Europe limits the potential for a rapid increase in Ukrainian exports.
The United Kingdom also entered 2026 with a combination of moderate growth and an elevated inflation background. In March, the British CPI rose to 3.3% year-on-year after 3.0% in February. The Bank of England kept the Bank Rate at 3.75%, reflecting the regulator’s caution in the face of the risk of a new inflation acceleration. For the European region as a whole, this meant that the cycle of rapid monetary easing had not begun.
“The global economy did not enter a recession in the first quarter of 2026, but it became noticeably more nervous. The United States maintains stable growth, but is facing a new inflation acceleration. The eurozone has a weaker economic impulse and again sees inflation above the target. The United Kingdom also remains in a mode of cautious monetary policy. For Ukraine, this means that the external world does not create a catastrophic background, but also does not provide an easy impulse for recovery. Under such conditions, it is impossible to rely only on external demand,” Urakin noted.
The Chinese economy maintained relatively strong dynamics in the first quarter of 2026. According to the National Bureau of Statistics of China, China’s GDP grew by 5.0% year-on-year in Q1, and by 1.3% quarter-on-quarter. Nominal GDP amounted to about 33.4 trillion yuan. At the same time, inflation remained moderate: CPI rose by 1.0% year-on-year in March, and averaged 0.9% in January-March.
China continued to demonstrate a strong manufacturing base and export potential, but structural problems — weaker domestic demand, the real estate market, debt burden and dependence on external markets — remained important constraints. For Ukraine, China remained a key source of imports, primarily machinery, equipment, electronics and industrial goods.
India retained its status as one of the main drivers of global growth. According to the government’s first advance estimate, India’s real GDP in the 2025/26 fiscal year was expected to grow by 7.4%, while nominal GDP was expected to grow by 8.0%. The main driver remained the services sector, as well as domestic demand and public investment. The Indian economy remained one of the most convincing examples of combining high growth with relatively controlled inflation.
Turkey remained an example of an economy with relatively high business activity, but a very difficult inflationary legacy. According to official TurkStat data, in March 2026 consumer prices rose by 1.94% month-on-month and by 30.87% year-on-year. This was lower than in February, when annual inflation was 31.53%, but still remained an extremely high level. At the same time, the Turkish economy grew by 3.6% in 2025, which indicated the preservation of domestic demand despite inflationary risks.
Brazil looked more balanced among large emerging economies. According to IBGE, Brazil’s GDP in 2025 grew by 2.3%, to 12.7 trillion reais at current prices. Growth was observed in the agricultural sector, industry and the services sector. According to the preliminary IPCA-15 indicator, inflation in March 2026 amounted to 0.44% for the month and 3.90% over the last 12 months. This confirmed that Brazil maintained a relatively controlled inflation background, although its economy also felt the impact of high rates and external uncertainty.
“China, India, Turkey and Brazil show different development models of large emerging economies. China maintains scale and manufacturing strength, but has structural imbalances. India demonstrates the highest dynamics among major economies and relies on domestic demand and the services sector. Turkey is growing, but pays for it with high inflation. Brazil is moving more slowly, but more balanced. For Ukraine, it is important to look at these examples practically: in global competition, those countries win that can simultaneously maintain macro-stability, production, exports and domestic investment demand,” Urakin believes.
Conclusions
As of the end of March 2026, Ukraine maintained macrofinancial manageability, but the first quarter demonstrated the fragility of economic stabilization. Real GDP in Q1 decreased by 0.6% year-on-year, inflation accelerated to 7.9% in March, the key policy rate remained at 15.0%, international reserves declined to about $52.0 billion, and the goods deficit in January-March exceeded $13 billion. The budget remained functional, but its structure was fully subordinated to wartime needs: more than 60% of general fund expenditures were directed to security and defense.
The main risks for Ukraine remained wartime losses, destruction of energy infrastructure, weak exports, labor shortages, high budget dependence on external financing and the structural foreign exchange deficit of the private sector. Positive factors included a significant level of international reserves, the NBU’s controlled policy, continued international support, business adaptability and the state’s ability to fulfill key budget obligations.
The global economy in the first quarter of 2026 remained relatively resilient, but less stable than at the beginning of the year. The IMF forecast global growth of 3.1% in 2026, provided that the conflict in the Middle East remained limited. The United States maintained positive dynamics but faced a new inflationary impulse; the eurozone remained weak in terms of growth rates and again saw inflation above the target; China demonstrated 5% growth; India remained the main driver among large economies; Turkey struggled with high inflation; Brazil maintained moderate, more balanced dynamics.
“March 2026 became a moment for Ukraine to test the real strength of its stabilization model. High reserves, international assistance and the NBU’s controlled policy allow the system to be kept in working condition. But the decline in GDP in the first quarter, accelerating inflation and a large trade deficit show that financial stability alone is not enough. The next stage must be the transition from a survival model to a model of productive recovery. This means investment in energy, the defense-industrial complex, processing, logistics, export production, technologies and human capital. Without this, even significant reserves and external assistance will remain only a safety cushion, not a source of long-term development,” Maksym Urakin concluded.
The monthly analytical and statistical product “Economic Monitoring” is available to clients of Interfax-Ukraine.
Head of the “Economic Monitoring” project, PhD in Economics Maksym Urakin
The volume of capital investments in Ukraine in the first quarter of 2026 rose by 5.1% compared to the first quarter of 2025, reaching 130.1 billion UAH, according to the State Statistics Service.
The agency specifies that 41.2% of the total value of capital investments was accounted for by industry (or 53.6 billion UAH), and 12.7% (or 16.5 billion UAH) by agriculture, forestry, and fisheries.
The vast majority of investments were concentrated in tangible assets—93.3% of the total volume. In particular, the largest amounts were invested in machinery, equipment, and tools (38.2%), engineering structures (19.2%), non-residential buildings (10.9%), and vehicles (10.5%).
According to the State Statistics Service, the main source of funding for capital investments in January–March of this year remains the own funds of enterprises and organizations—78.6%.
As previously reported, capital investments in Ukraine in 2025 increased by 20.3% compared to 2024, reaching 893.6 billion UAH.
CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, ECONOMY, ENTERPRISES, INDUSTRY, State Statistics Service
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) has lowered its forecast for Ukraine’s real gross domestic product growth in 2026 to 2.2% due to the protracted war, but notes that macroeconomic stability has been maintained thanks to external support.
“This is slightly lower than the 2.5% forecast published in February, but should hostilities ease and post-war reconstruction begin, the forecast for 2027 remains unchanged at 4.0%,” according to the EBRD’s “Regional Economic Prospects” (REP) report, published on Wednesday.
The bank emphasizes that Ukraine is maintaining macroeconomic stability even in the fifth year of Russia’s aggressive war thanks to significant external financing. The outlook continues to depend largely on the course of the war and the availability of external financial support.
“The main downside risk to the forecast is linked to the energy crisis caused by the conflict in the Middle East, which could significantly worsen Ukraine’s already unstable energy situation,” the report states.
The EBRD attributes the slowdown in economic growth to 1.8% in 2025 and the weak start this year to ongoing wartime constraints: labor shortages and persistent attacks on energy infrastructure have disrupted industrial activity and logistics, while broader supply chain issues have limited production.
The bank notes that inflation has also begun to rise again after slowing to 7.4% in January 2026 following a period of tighter monetary policy and relative exchange rate stability. Higher global energy prices linked to the conflict in the Middle East are adding new pressure, increasing costs for businesses and households and contributing to a resurgence of inflationary momentum.
According to the EBRD, fiscal support remains crucial. Ukraine’s budget deficit, excluding grants, reached 23.6% of GDP in 2025 and is projected to remain elevated at 19.3% of GDP in 2026, reflecting exceptionally high spending on defense and social services. These needs are financed largely through official external support, which continues to underpin macroeconomic stability. The allocated external financing of over EUR110 billion for 2026–27 is expected to mitigate short-term risks.
The Bank notes that it is Ukraine’s largest institutional investor and has significantly increased its support in response to the full-scale war: since its onset in February 2022, the EBRD has allocated nearly EUR10.0 billion to Ukraine.
As reported, the National Bank lowered its GDP growth forecast for this year to 1.3% from 1.8% in April.
The government’s forecast, included in the 2026 state budget, currently projects 2.4% growth, but Economy Minister Oleksiy Sobolev recently announced plans to revise it downward.
According to the State Statistics Service, Ukraine’s GDP growth slowed to 1.8% in 2025 from 2.9% in 2024 and 5.5% in 2023, following a 28.8% decline in 2022—the first year of full-scale Russian aggression.
This article presents key macroeconomic indicators for Ukraine and the global economy as of the end of December 2025. The analysis is based on current data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine (SSSU), the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, as well as leading national statistical agencies (Eurostat, BEA, NBS, ONS, TurkStat, IBGE). Maksym Urakin, Director of Development and Marketing at Interfax-Ukraine, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Doctor of Philosophy in History, and founder of the Experts Club information and analytical center, presented an overview of current macroeconomic trends that shaped the situation in Ukraine and the world at the beginning of 2026.
Ukraine’s Macroeconomic Indicators
As of the end of January 2026, the Ukrainian economy entered the new year with a combination of two opposing trends: on the one hand—a gradual easing of inflationary pressure, record-high international reserves, and a stable situation in the foreign exchange market; on the other—war risks, high budget dependence on external financing, weak exports, and a structural foreign exchange deficit in the private sector.
According to the NBU’s estimates, Ukraine’s real GDP grew by 1.8% in 2025. This meant that the economy maintained positive momentum for the third consecutive year, but the pace of recovery remained moderate. The NBU attributed this trend to resilient domestic demand, accommodative fiscal policy, business adaptability, and measures to maintain macrofinancial stability. At the same time, physical export volumes declined due to low agricultural inventories, weak external demand for mining and metallurgical products, and constraints related to the electricity shortage at the end of the year.
In January 2026, the disinflationary trend continued. According to data from the State Statistics Service (SSU), as commented on by the NBU, consumer inflation slowed to 7.4% year-on-year, while prices rose by 0.7% month-on-month. Core inflation also declined—to 7.0% y/y. The NBU attributed this trend to a reduction in labor market imbalances, the secondary effects of the high harvests of 2025, competition from certain imported goods, and a stable situation in the foreign exchange market. At the same time, the regulator noted the first signs of increasing pressure from raw food products.
According to Maksym Urakin, January 2026 became an important test for the Ukrainian economy following the conclusion of a challenging 2025. The decline in inflation to 7.4% showed that tight monetary conditions, stabilization of the foreign exchange market, and an improvement in the supply of food products had yielded results. However, in his assessment, this result should not be interpreted as a complete normalization.
“At the beginning of 2026, Ukraine experienced a rare combination for a war economy—inflation was falling, the foreign exchange market remained under control, reserves reached a historic high, and the economy did not lose its positive momentum. However, this does not mean that the country has entered a classic recovery phase. We are dealing rather with a stabilization regime in which many indicators look better thanks to external financing, budget expenditures, business adaptation, and NBU policy. If international aid were removed from this framework or a new severe energy or currency shock were to occur, the system’s stability would once again be in serious doubt,” Urakin noted.
The NBU’s January decision on the discount rate was one of the key signals of the start of the year. On January 29, 2026, the National Bank announced the start of a cycle of monetary policy easing and a reduction in the discount rate from 15.5% to 15.0% effective January 30. The regulator attributed this to a sustained decline in inflationary pressures and a reduction in risks associated with external financing. At the same time, the NBU emphasized that inflation expectations remained relatively high, and a return of inflation to the 5% target is expected only on the policy horizon.
This decision did not signify a shift to a soft monetary policy in the full sense. Real yields on hryvnia-denominated instruments remained positive, and continued interest in hryvnia assets was one of the key factors restraining demand for foreign currency. In its January Inflation Report, the NBU noted that maintaining a high rate in previous months had supported demand for hryvnia-denominated assets, and individuals’ investments in government bonds and deposits in the national currency continued to grow.
“Lowering the discount rate to 15% was a cautious and logical step, but it should not be interpreted as a signal of imminent cheapening of money. Ukraine remains in a state of war, with high budgetary needs and a significant private-sector foreign exchange deficit. Therefore, the NBU is effectively trying to navigate a very narrow corridor: on the one hand, not to stifle economic activity with excessively expensive money, and on the other, not to lose control over inflation expectations and the foreign exchange market. In such a situation, every rate cut should not be a political gesture, but the result of a real easing of risks,” Urakin emphasized.
The external sector remained the main pillar of Ukraine’s macrofinancial stability. As of the end of January 2026, Ukraine’s international reserves rose to $57.7 billion, setting a new all-time high. The NBU attributed the increase in reserves to inflows of external financing, which largely offset the National Bank’s net foreign exchange sales and the country’s foreign currency debt payments.
In its January Inflation Report, the NBU also noted that in 2025, Ukraine received $52.4 billion in international financial support, including $32.7 billion from the EU, $12.0 billion from the U.S., and $3.4 billion from Canada. At the beginning of 2026, reserves stood at $57.3 billion, equivalent to 5.8 months of future imports, and the NBU’s forecast projected an increase in international reserves to $65 billion by the end of 2026 and to $71 billion by the end of 2028.
At the same time, foreign trade remained a weak point. According to customs data, Ukraine’s trade turnover in January 2026 amounted to $9.9 billion: imports – $6.7 billion, exports – $3.2 billion. This meant that the trade deficit remained high, and domestic demand for imports continued to significantly exceed foreign exchange earnings from exports.
“Record reserves are a strong stabilizing factor, but they should not create the illusion of self-sufficiency. Ukraine’s balance of payments continues to rely heavily on foreign aid rather than the economy’s export capacity. When imports more than double exports in merchandise trade, it means that the country is financing a significant portion of current consumption and military needs with external resources. This is justified in wartime, but strategically, such a model cannot be permanent. “In 2026, the key task should be to expand the country’s own foreign exchange base through exports, processing, energy resilience, and investments in production,” Urakin emphasized.
The budget situation at the beginning of 2026 also remained relatively under control, but structurally strained. According to aggregated data on budget execution, in January 2026, state budget revenues amounted to approximately 303.8 billion UAH, while expenditures totaled approximately 286.2 billion UAH. This monthly picture did not negate the overall problem of the year: public finances remained dependent on the regularity of external financing, domestic borrowing, and the government’s ability to maintain confidence in hryvnia-denominated instruments.
The Global Economy
The global economy at the end of January 2026 appeared more resilient than expected at the end of 2025, but this resilience was uneven. In its January update to the World Economic Outlook, the IMF projected global economic growth of 3.3% in 2026 and 3.2% in 2027. The Fund attributed this to investments in technology, fiscal and monetary support, more favorable financial conditions, and the resilience of the private sector. At the same time, the IMF warned of risks associated with overoptimistic expectations regarding the technology sector and a potential escalation of geopolitical tensions.
In the U.S., the economy maintained positive momentum, but the pace slowed by the end of 2025. According to a preliminary BEA estimate, U.S. real GDP grew by 1.4% year-over-year in the fourth quarter of 2025 following a stronger third quarter, and by 2.2% for the full year 2025. Growth was driven by consumer spending and investment, while exports and government spending held back the result. Inflation in the U.S. remained moderately above target: the Consumer Price Index rose by 2.7% from December 2024 to December 2025, and core CPI by 2.6%. On January 28, 2026, the Federal Reserve kept the target range for the federal funds rate at 3.5–3.75%.
The eurozone entered early 2026 with inflation nearly at target but with weak economic momentum. According to Eurostat estimates, annual inflation in the Eurozone stood at 2.0% in December 2025, down from 2.1% in November. Services inflation remained the highest component at 3.4%, while the energy component was negative. ECB rates at the start of 2026 remained at the levels set in 2025: the deposit rate at 2.0%, the main refinancing operations rate at 2.15%, and the marginal lending rate at 2.40%.
The United Kingdom remained one of the most controversial major economies in Europe. According to ONS data, the UK’s GDP grew by 1.3% in 2025, driven in part by the services sector. However, inflation accelerated to 3.4% year-on-year in December 2025, remaining significantly above the Bank of England’s target. In December 2025, the Bank of England cut its base rate to 3.75%, but the decision was passed by a narrow 5–4 majority, indicating that disagreements within the regulator regarding the pace of further easing persisted.
“The global economy at the start of 2026 did not appear to be in crisis, but it could not be described as uniformly strong. The U.S. maintained positive momentum, though no longer at an overheated pace; the eurozone was effectively balancing between low inflation and weak growth; the UK experienced slow growth but still faced elevated inflationary pressures. For Ukraine, this means that external demand is unlikely to become a powerful independent driver of recovery. The global environment tends to create moderately favorable financial conditions, but does not guarantee automatic growth in Ukrainian exports,” noted Maksym Urakin.
China ended 2025 with a formally strong result. According to data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the country’s GDP grew by 5.0% in 2025, reaching 140.1879 trillion yuan. The primary sector grew by 3.9%, the secondary sector by 4.5%, and the tertiary sector by 5.4%. At the same time, the inflation picture remained weak: in December 2025, the CPI rose by only 0.8% year-on-year, while core inflation rose by 1.2%. This indicated that the Chinese economy maintained its manufacturing and export strength, but domestic consumer demand remained insufficiently robust.
India, by contrast, remained the main growth driver among major economies. According to the government’s first preliminary estimate, India’s real GDP was projected to grow by 7.4% in the 2025/26 fiscal year, following 6.5% in the 2024/25 fiscal year. Nominal GDP was estimated to grow by 8.0%, with the services sector being the main driver of real GVA. At the same time, inflation remained very low: in December 2025, the CPI stood at 1.33% year-on-year, and food inflation was negative.
At the start of 2026, Turkey remained an example of an economy with relatively high growth but a challenging inflationary legacy. According to TurkStat, inflation stood at 30.89% year-on-year in December 2025 and at 30.65% in January 2026. Subsequent official data from the Turkish Ministry of Trade showed that the country’s economy grew by 3.6% in 2025 and by 3.4% year-on-year in the fourth quarter.
Brazil ended 2025 on a cautiously positive note. According to IBGE data, IPCA inflation in 2025 stood at 4.26%, while the December monthly rate was 0.33%. Brazil’s GDP in 2025 grew by 2.3%, reaching 12.7 trillion reais at current prices. Growth was observed in all three major sectors: agriculture, industry, and services.
“China, India, Turkey, and Brazil clearly demonstrate how diverse the dynamics of major emerging economies have become. China has a large scale and a strong manufacturing base, but its price momentum remains weak. India demonstrates the most compelling combination of high growth and low inflation. Turkey maintains its momentum, but the price of this growth is a very high inflation rate. Brazil is moving more moderately but more balanced. “It is important for Ukraine to view these examples not in the abstract, but practically: in global competition, the economies that win are those capable of simultaneously maintaining macro-stability, a manufacturing base, exports, and domestic investment demand,” Urakin believes.
Conclusions
As of the end of January 2026, Ukraine was in a mode of managed macrofinancial stabilization. Inflation was declining, the discount rate had been cautiously reduced to 15%, international reserves had reached a historic high, and the economy maintained positive growth after the end of 2025. At the same time, this stability remained dependent on three key conditions: regular external financing, a controlled situation in the foreign exchange market, and the state’s ability to sustain domestic demand without triggering a new wave of inflation.
The main risks for Ukraine at the start of 2026 remained war-related losses, energy infrastructure deficits, weak exports, high budgetary needs, dependence on international aid, and a structural labor shortage. A positive factor was that the NBU had record reserves and room for cautious policy easing. A negative factor was that the real production and export base had not yet created sufficient domestic resources for self-sustained recovery.
The global economy was not in a phase of deep crisis at that time. The IMF projected global growth of 3.3% in 2026; the U.S. remained stable, the eurozone stayed close to its inflation target, India demonstrated high growth rates, and China remained a large but structurally mixed source of global demand. At the same time, none of these external factors guaranteed Ukraine a rapid recovery without domestic decisions.
“January 2026 showed that Ukraine is entering the new year not from a position of economic breakthrough, but from a position of maintained manageability. This is important because, in the context of war, the very ability to control inflation, the exchange rate, budget needs, and reserves is already a significant achievement. But the next stage will be more challenging: the country needs to transition from a model of survival and stabilization to a model of productive recovery. This means investing in energy, the defense-industrial complex, processing, logistics, export-oriented industries, human capital, and technology. Without this, even record reserves and foreign aid will remain merely a financial cushion, not a source of long-term growth,” concluded Maksym Urakin.
The monthly analytical and statistical product “Economic Monitoring” is available to Interfax-Ukraine clients.
Maksym Urakin, Head of the “Economic Monitoring” project, Director of Development and Marketing at Interfax-Ukraine, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Doctor of Philosophy in History, and founder of the Experts Club information and analytical center
ECONOMY, EXPERTS_CLUB, MACROECONOMICS, MONITORING, Ukrainian_economy, URAKIN
