Business news from Ukraine

Business news from Ukraine

BitMine increased its reserves to 5.96 mln ETH and is now close to holding 5% of Ethereum supply

According to Fixygen, the strategies of the largest public companies that have built up cryptocurrency reserves began to diverge significantly in September.

Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, has not purchased any BTC for the second week in a row. Instead, the company allocated approximately $139.3 million to repurchase its own STRC preferred shares.

As of September 13, Strategy held approximately 845.05 thousand BTC, purchased for a total of $63.73 billion. The average purchase price was about $75.4 thousand per Bitcoin.

In other words, the company temporarily redirected part of its free liquidity from Bitcoin accumulation toward managing its own capital structure.

For Strategy, the STRC buyback makes economic sense, as it allows the company to reduce future dividend obligations if the securities trade below their par value of $100. The company announced back in the summer that it intends to regularly repurchase STRC at a significant discount.

BitMine Immersion Technologies is pursuing a completely opposite strategy.

On September 14, the company reported that it had increased its reserves to 5.96 million ETH, which corresponds to approximately 4.9% of Ethereum’s total supply of 122 million tokens.

Over the course of the week, BitMine acquired an additional 27,000 ETH, bringing it closer to its goal of holding 5% of Ethereum’s supply.

The company estimates the total value of its crypto assets and cash reserves at approximately $15.8 billion.

The difference between the two models is becoming increasingly apparent. Strategy is effectively building a financial company centered on Bitcoin and managing a complex system of common stock, preferred securities, and debt capital.

BitMine, on the other hand, is trying to accumulate Ethereum as quickly as possible while simultaneously capitalizing on the opportunity to generate income from staking.

This divergence points to the next stage in the development of companies managing digital assets: the market is beginning to evaluate not only the quantity of accumulated coins, but also the method of financing, the cost of capital, the return on assets, and the risk of dilution for shareholders.

, , , ,

Strategy Controls Two-Thirds of Corporate Bitcoin Holdings — Global Ranking

According to Fixygen, public companies worldwide control approximately 1.264 million BTC worth nearly $99 billion, as reported by The Block’s Bitcoin Treasury Tracker as of the end of August.

The largest holders:

Strategy — 840,447 BTC

Twenty One Capital — 43,514 BTC

Metaplanet — 43,000 BTC

MARA — 35,303 BTC

Cantor Equity Partners I / future BSTR — 30,021 BTC

Galaxy Digital — 25,723 BTC

Bullish — 24,400 BTC

Strive — 19,999 BTC

SpaceX — 18,712 BTC

Riot Platforms — 15,680 BTC.

Separately, Coinbase holds 15,389 BTC, Tesla — 11,509 BTC, and Block — 9,032 BTC.

The main feature of the ranking is its extreme concentration. A single strategy accounts for about two-thirds of all BTC held by the tracked public companies.

https://www.fixygen.ua/news/20260902/strategy-kontrolyue-dvi-tretini-korporativnih-zapasiv-bitkoyniv-svitoviy-reyting.html

 

, , , ,

Strategy holds 4% of all bitcoins, but its market capitalization is already lower than value of BTC on its balance sheet

According to Fixygen, Strategy remains the world’s largest corporate holder of bitcoin. As of August 23, the company held 840,447 BTC, or about 4% of the maximum possible supply of the first cryptocurrency.

At a BTC price of $77,004, its Bitcoin reserves were valued at $64.72 billion, while Strategy’s market capitalization stood at approximately $49.6 billion.

At first glance, it appears that investors value the entire company at less than the value of the Bitcoin it holds.

However, this comparison is incomplete. In addition to BTC, Strategy held $6.69 billion in dollar-denominated assets, but at the same time had approximately $6.75 billion in debt and $14.97 billion in preferred stock, which ranks higher than common shareholders in the capital structure.

After accounting for these liabilities, Strategy itself estimated the net value of its reserves at approximately $49.68 billion—nearly the same as its market capitalization.

This is precisely why the company’s mNAV ratio as of August 23 stood at around 1.01x. In other words, the huge premium that investors previously paid for the opportunity to gain indirect exposure to bitcoin through MSTR has virtually disappeared.

This is a fundamental shift in Sailor’s model: Strategy remains the world’s largest Bitcoin treasury, but its stock is increasingly valued as a financial entity with BTC, debt, and expensive preferred equity, rather than as “Bitcoin at a premium.”

, , , ,

Strategy Sold $216 Mln in Bitcoin for First Time Since 2020

According to Fixygen, the American company Strategy Inc. sold $216 million worth of Bitcoin, marking the company’s largest cryptocurrency sale since it began building its Bitcoin portfolio in 2020.

This is an important psychological signal for the crypto market. Strategy has long been viewed as one of Bitcoin’s leading corporate supporters and a role model for companies considering BTC as a reserve asset. Therefore, even a partial sale could heighten investors’ doubts about the sustainability of corporate demand for cryptocurrency.

According to the company, this is only its third Bitcoin sale since 2020. However, the scale of the transaction significantly exceeds previous ones, and the timing was chosen amid a weak market: on Monday, Bitcoin fell by 1.9% to $61,532, and has lost 30% of its value since the start of the year.

An additional negative factor was Strategy’s $8.32 billion loss on digital assets for April–June. This illustrates just how sensitive the company’s business model has become to Bitcoin’s revaluation and the crypto market’s decline.

Strategy’s stock fell 4.5% in pre-market trading on Monday. Since the beginning of the year, the company’s market capitalization has shrunk by nearly 34%—to $35.3 billion—while the Nasdaq Composite Index rose by more than 11% over the same period. This means that investors no longer view Strategy as a typical technology company, but rather as a high-risk proxy for Bitcoin.

For the crypto world, the main issue is not the amount of the sale itself, but the shift in perception. If a company that has spent years building an image as the largest corporate holder of BTC begins to sell the asset in significant volumes, the market may see this as a signal: even long-term institutional holders are forced to lock in liquidity or reduce risk.

In the short term, this could intensify pressure on Bitcoin and related stocks, especially if investors begin to anticipate further sales. More broadly, the Strategy case shows that corporate Bitcoin holdings remain not only an investment story but also a source of volatility for balance sheets, financial reporting, and the stock market.

The crypto market will now be watching not only the Bitcoin price and ETF flows but also whether Strategy continues its sales. If these turn out to be a one-time transaction, the impact may be limited. However, if the company begins to systematically reduce its position, it will be one of the most significant bearish signals for the market since 2020.

, , ,

Strategy purchased $2.54 bln worth of Bitcoin – largest purchase in two years

According to Fixygen, Strategy Inc., one of the largest corporate holders of Bitcoin, purchased $2.54 billion worth of the cryptocurrency last week, according to documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This marks the company’s largest weekly Bitcoin purchase volume since November 2024.

According to the disclosed information, the purchase was financed using funds raised by Strategy through a $2.18 billion placement of preferred shares, as well as common shares.

Amid this news, the price of Bitcoin rose 0.6% on Monday, reaching $75,136. Over the past month, the cryptocurrency has risen 6% in value.

At the same time, Strategy’s own shares fell 3% in pre-market trading in the U.S.

Strategy Inc. is an American software development company, formerly known as MicroStrategy. In recent years, it has become one of the most prominent public corporate investors in Bitcoin, making the purchase of cryptocurrency a key element of its financial strategy. The company regularly raises capital through stock and debt offerings to further expand its cryptocurrency reserves.

,

Vietnam’s strategic horizon for 2030–2045 — results of 14th National Party Congress

On January 20, 2026, the 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) was officially opened at the National Convention Center in Hanoi. Held every five years, this is an important political event for the country, ushering in a new era of national development.

This congress brought together more than 1,500 delegates to discuss strategic issues for the country in the fields of politics, diplomacy, and economics.

The congress was attended by 111 ambassadors, chargés d’affaires of various countries, as well as heads of diplomatic missions and international organizations in Vietnam.

The opening session of the Congress was chaired by Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh on behalf of the Presidium. After that, Vietnamese President General Luong Quang delivered an opening speech to the Congress, in which he presented the main theses and tasks of the country’s development vision and emphasized the beginning of a new page in Vietnam’s domestic and foreign policy.

In his speech, the President stressed that Vietnam prioritizes economic development, building on the achievements of 40 years of reform and creating a solid foundation for the country’s further development in a new era, pursuing an independent, self-reliant, multilateral, and diversified foreign policy, harmoniously managing relations with partners, especially with major powers, neighboring countries, and important partners.

Therefore, one of the central topics discussed and decided at this congress was the focus on the goal of high economic growth over the next five years.

• The Vietnamese economy is currently in a boom phase with GDP growth rates of 7.09% in 2024 compared to the previous year and an estimated 8.02% in 2025.

• Vietnam aims to achieve annual economic growth of at least 10% over the next five years, while maintaining macroeconomic stability and controlling inflation.

• Unlike many countries, where strategic documents are often dependent on political cycles, Vietnam declares an approach focused on consistency, institutional continuity, and development in clearly defined stages.

Secretary General of the CPC Central Committee, Chairman of the Document Subcommittee Mr. To Lam presented the 13th Central Committee’s report on the documents of the 14th Party Congress.

In his speech, he reaffirmed the strategic vision, spirit of innovation, and need for decisive action for a new stage of national development. “The 14th National Party Congress marks an important event, opening a new chapter in the country’s development under new conditions, situations, and goals; it is a congress of strategic autonomy, independence, self-reliance, national pride, aspirations for progress, and unwavering faith in the path chosen by the Party, President Ho Chi Minh, and our people,” said the General Secretary.

To achieve the country’s development goals in the near term, emphasis is placed on key guiding principles that are considered a strategic “launch pad” for realizing the goal of transforming Vietnam into a developed country with a high income level by 2045, namely:

1. Strategic decisions on economic development and domestic policy, with an emphasis on technology, innovation, and digital transformation (Active introduction of digital technologies into all areas of life and governance, identifying them as a new driver of growth, linked to artificial intelligence (AI), digital government, and digital society).

The prioritization of science, technology, digital transformation, and artificial intelligence is in line with global trends.

At the same time, Vietnam declares its desire to combine technological modernization with the development of its own human resources and internal competencies. This approach is characteristic of countries seeking to transition from the role of production sites to participants in higher-level technological and innovation chains.

2. Institutional reforms and strengthening of public administration

Significant emphasis is placed on improving institutional architecture: optimising the administrative system, decentralisation and developing the legal environment.

In a comparative context, this brings Vietnam closer to development models where institutional capacity is seen as a key driver of sustainable growth, rather than just a supporting element of a market economy.

3. Energy transformation is seen not as an environmental policy, but as an economic prerequisite for maintaining export competitiveness.

The Joint Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) and aggressive development of renewable energy should ensure compliance with the decarbonization requirements of global supply chains.

4. Anti-corruption campaign (“Blazing Furnace”) and management balance

The anti-corruption campaign will be shifted from political mobilization to an institutional format.

The key challenge remains overcoming the so-called “fear of signing” — bureaucratic paralysis that slows down the implementation of infrastructure and investment projects. The focus is expected to be on the digitalization of control and a clearer division of responsibilities.

5. Comprehensively develop the cultural and social spheres, improve people’s living standards, and ensure social security.

6. Confirm the course of independence and multi-vector foreign policy.

The confirmation of a multi-vector foreign policy indicates Vietnam’s intention to maintain strategic autonomy in the face of growing global competition.

Vietnam’s declared strategic course combines:

• long-term state planning;

• ambitious economic growth targets;

• institutional and administrative reforms;

• selective technological modernization;

• the pursuit of foreign policy balance.

Taken together, this forms a pragmatic development model that differs from both liberalized market approaches and rigidly centralized economic systems, reflecting an attempt to adapt to conditions of global uncertainty.

, , ,