The Polish government has approved a bill requiring the mandatory registration of apartments and houses rented to tourists for short periods. Rentals lasting up to 30 days will officially be classified as hotel services.
The bill must still be reviewed by parliament and signed by the president. Most of the new rules are set to take effect 14 days after the adopted law is published in the official gazette.
A central element of the reform will be the creation of a nationwide registry of tourist accommodations—the Centralny Wykaz Turystycznych Obiektów Noclegowych. This registry will include not only hotels and guesthouses but also private apartments offered through Airbnb, Booking.com, and other platforms.
Each property will be assigned a unique identification number. Owners will be required to include this number in all listings. Online platforms will be required to verify the presence of a registration number and provide booking information to government authorities.
For owners, this means that informal short-term rentals will become significantly riskier. Operating without registration, failing to include an identification number in a listing, or providing false information will result in administrative fines of up to 50,000 zlotys, which is approximately 11,600 euros.
Apartments for short-term rental will have to comply with health, building, and fire safety requirements. Each property must display the house rules, information on quiet hours, and contact information for the owner or manager. However, there are no plans to automatically subject residential buildings to the same fire safety requirements as full-fledged hotels.
Local authorities will be granted the right to designate zones where short-term rentals of private apartments will be restricted or completely prohibited. Such measures may be applied primarily in historic centers and the busiest tourist areas of Warsaw, Kraków, Gdańsk, Sopot, and other cities. The restrictions will not automatically apply to officially classified hotels, motels, and guesthouses.
Residents of apartment buildings, housing communities, and housing cooperatives will be granted additional powers. They will be able to request that the municipality inspect an apartment if tourists regularly disturb the peace, violate safety rules, or disrupt public order.
In the event of repeated violations, the property may be removed from the registry. In such a case, renting it to tourists will be prohibited, and the property may not be re-registered for at least one year. A property owner’s refusal to allow an inspection may also serve as grounds for removal.
Authorities explain the reform as necessary to reduce the informal sector, improve tourist safety, and ensure a level playing field for private landlords and the hotel industry. The Ministry of Sport and Tourism emphasizes that the government does not intend to completely ban affordable short-term rentals, which are used by many Polish families.
For investors, the changes mean higher costs for registering and maintaining properties. Owners will have to register each apartment, comply with safety requirements, and take into account the possibility of local restrictions. The reform may prove particularly challenging for owners of multiple apartments in popular tourist areas.
The reform is also linked to the implementation of EU Regulation 2024/1028 on the collection and exchange of data in the short-term rental market, which has been in effect in the European Union since May 20, 2026. The European rules provide for uniform registration mechanisms and the transfer of information by platforms to government agencies.
Thus, Poland is transitioning from a relatively unregulated model of daily rentals to a system similar to the regulation of the hotel industry. The final deadlines and wording will depend on the bill’s passage through parliament; however, property owners are already advised to prepare documentation for their properties and verify their compliance with health, building, and fire safety requirements.
In January–June of this year, Ukraine’s mining companies reduced their exports of iron ore raw materials (IORM) by 25.4% in volume terms compared to the same period last year—down to 12 million 33.825 thousand metric tons from 16 million 137.809 thousand metric tons.
According to statistics released by the State Customs Service (SCS), 2,021,299 metric tons of iron ore were exported in June, 2,239,167 metric tons in May, 2,163,837 metric tons in April, in March—2,300,467 thousand metric tons, in February—1,254,516 thousand metric tons, and in January—2,054,539 thousand metric tons.
During the first six months of the year, foreign exchange earnings from raw material exports decreased by 26.3% to $935.258 million.
Mineral resources were exported primarily to China (42.36% of shipments in monetary terms), Slovakia (18.50%), and Poland (14.13%).
In addition, in January–June 2026, Ukraine imported 224 metric tons of raw materials worth $62,000 from the Netherlands (38.71%), Poland (32.26%), and Italy (29.03%), whereas in January–June 2025, it imported 75,000 metric tons worth $52,000.
As previously reported, Ukraine’s mining companies reduced ore exports in physical terms by 8% in 2025 compared to the previous year—to 30,995,363 metric tons from 33,699,722 metric tons, and foreign exchange revenue decreased by 16.6%—to $2 billion 337.765 million from $2 billion 803.223 million. Exports were primarily shipped to China (44.98% of shipments by value), Slovakia (17.15%), and Poland (16.09%).
In addition, in 2025, Ukraine imported 130 metric tons of raw materials worth $95 thousand from the Netherlands (46.32%), Italy (36.84%), and Norway (13.68%), whereas the previous year it imported 2,042 thousand metric tons worth $414 thousand
Ferrexpo plc, a mining and ore company with its main assets in Ukraine, produced 1,385,139 metric tons of pellets in January–June of this year, which is 36% lower than in January–June of last year (2,169,631 metric tons), but in the second quarter, it increased production of this product by 64% compared to the first quarter—to 860,213 thousand metric tons from 524,926 thousand metric tons.
According to the company’s press release on Wednesday, total production of marketable products (pellet and iron ore concentrate) for the first half of 2026 fell by 54% compared to the first half of 2025—to 1,556,160 thousand metric tons. In particular, production of premium-grade Fe67% concentrate amounted to 171,021 thousand metric tons, compared to 1,223,504 thousand metric tons (a decrease of 86%). The company also produced 1,221,968 thousand metric tons of premium-grade pellets (a 41% decrease) and 163,171 thousand metric tons of DR pellets (compared to 81,787 thousand metric tons produced in the first half of 2025).
The press release notes that the group continues to operate under significant constraints caused, in particular, by serious operational and financial risks related to the war in Ukraine. These factors include the mobilization of a significant portion of the workforce into the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as disruptions and restrictions in logistics, as a result of which only one iron ore pellet production line is currently in operation.
The group continues to focus on cost management and operational activities to preserve working capital amid significant constraints. At the same time, the Group continues to optimize its product mix (the ratio of pellet production to concentrate production) and manage the allocation of shipments among customers. In addition, operating expenses have been reduced across all business lines over an extended period, a situation that will require a solution in the future.
As a result of these measures, as of June 30, 2026, the Group’s available cash balance stood at approximately $27 million (excluding funds held at MBaer Merchant Bank (MBaer), whose banking license was revoked in February 2026). As of June 30, 2026, the Group’s net cash position (excluding lease obligations) was approximately $21 million (for comparison: as of March 31, 2026, this figure was approximately $25 million; as of December 31, 2025, it was $47 million; as of June 30, 2025, it was $50 million; and as of December 31, 2024, it was $101 million).
Given the measures taken by the Group, as well as current production volumes, actual and projected energy prices for the next quarter, and an optimized sales structure, the Group forecasts that its available net cash (net of lease obligations and funds locked up in MBaer) will be sufficient to continue operations under the current challenging conditions until the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2026. This forecast depends on the volatility of iron ore prices and operating expenses (particularly energy costs) and is based on the assumption that there will be no material changes in the Group’s operating conditions (including energy supply) Furthermore, the arbitration administrator appointed as part of the Poltava Mining and Processing Plant’s bankruptcy proceedings will not impose restrictive measures, and there will be no final, non-appealable adverse decisions in the various judicial and administrative proceedings to which the Group is currently a party.
The Group remains in a precarious financial position and is implementing cost-cutting measures across all areas of its operations, particularly with regard to operating and capital expenditures. In addition, significant operating expenditures have been deferred, particularly those related to the optimization of mining operations, repairs, and maintenance of processing and pellet production facilities, as well as mining equipment.
Against this backdrop, the group is maintaining its workforce at 6,299 employees to retain the skilled professionals needed to manage flexible production volumes in response to market demand. This figure currently includes 804 employees serving in the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
The press release states that the Group’s VAT refunds have been suspended since March 2025. As a result of this suspension, as of June 30, 2026, VAT receivables in Ukraine amounted to $90.4 million (net of related provisions); (for comparison: as of March 31, 2026, this figure stood at $90.3 million). Of this amount, as of the date of this announcement, $87.5 million had been claimed for refunds covering the period from January 2025 through June 2026, with the Ukrainian tax authorities having denied refunds for approximately $80.8 million (relating to the period from January 2025 through April 2026).
The company is in negotiations with Ukrainian authorities to find a long-term solution to the issue of obtaining VAT refunds. Although the company is striving to reach an agreement, given the complexity of the situation, the possibility of reaching such an agreement and the timeline for its implementation remain uncertain, according to the press release.
The company also provides an update on the status of its legal proceedings. Specifically, regarding the long-standing legal dispute between “Maxi Capital Group” Financial Company LLC (Maxi Capital) and PGZK regarding disputed guarantee agreements and a claim in the amount of 4.727 billion hryvnia (approximately $105.4 million as of June 30, 2026), the group reports that the main claim is currently being considered by the Supreme Court of Ukraine. On May 1, 2026, the court expanded the panel to 17 judges. The next court hearing in this case is scheduled for October 12, 2026.
Proceedings in the PGZK bankruptcy case: Following the local court of first instance’s decision on February 24, 2026, to open bankruptcy proceedings based on Maxi Capital’s petition, PGZK filed an appeal against that decision. Following the official recusal of the original three-judge panel on April 30, 2026, a new panel was appointed. During the hearing on June 2, 2026, the appellate court heard the parties’ arguments and scheduled the next hearing for July 27, 2026.
The company has updated information regarding its financing options. The Board of Directors continues to believe that raising equity capital is currently the most viable solution within the required timeframe. This capital raise will likely be structured as a conditional placement of new shares among certain existing and new institutional investors with the aim of raising at least $100 million. These funds are necessary to maintain the Group’s working capital levels, meet its short-term operational needs, increase production volumes, and carry out previously deferred work on deposit development (overburden removal) and capital expenditures while operating at reduced capacity over the next 18 months. The Group is actively working on a series of measures necessary to begin implementing the planned capital raise.
The Company continues negotiations with representatives of its largest shareholder—Fevamotinico S.a.r.l.—regarding its participation in the equity financing. At this stage, there is no certainty that the Group will be able to successfully carry out the planned fundraising. If the issues regarding the delay in VAT refunds and financing problems are not resolved in a timely manner, this could lead to serious negative consequences for the Group. In particular, the Company or Group entities may be forced to file for insolvency in the relevant jurisdictions, and shareholders may lose all or a significant portion of their investments.
Regarding the delay in the publication of the audited financial statements for 2025, the listing, and trading of the Company’s shares: Given that the preparation of the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, under the going concern assumption, depends on the successful completion of the planned capital raising, the Company has not yet been able to publish its audited financial results for that period. The results for the 2025 fiscal year are expected to be released concurrently with the launch of the planned capital raising process.
Following the release of the results for the 2025 fiscal year, the company will apply to the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to lift the suspension of its listing, thereby allowing trading in the company’s shares to resume.
Commenting on the group’s performance, interim acting chairman Lucio Genovese stated, “We are very pleased that we were able to restore stable production during this period, despite the numerous operational and logistical challenges we faced.”
“We took the opportunity to improve our sales mix through exports of direct-recovery pellets (DR pellets/FDP) and continue to cut costs across the entire company to preserve our available working capital, which is being depleted due to the lack of VAT refunds starting in March 2025. We are continuing our efforts to raise capital, which is the most viable solution for addressing the working capital shortfall,” Genovese noted.
As previously reported, Ferrexpo produced 3,221,461 metric tons of pellets in 2025, which is 47% less than in the previous year (6,070,541 metric tons). At the same time, total production of marketable products (pellets and iron ore concentrate) for 2025 decreased by 9% to 6,141,759 thousand metric tons. Specifically, marketable concentrate output amounted to 2,920,298 thousand metric tons, compared to 709,803 thousand metric tons, respectively. The company also produced 81,787 thousand metric tons of DR pellets (compared to 489,720 thousand metric tons in 2024) and 3,139,674 thousand metric tons of premium-grade pellets (a 44% decrease).
In 2024, Ferrexpo increased pellet production by 58% compared to 2023—to 6,070,541 metric tons from 3,845,325 metric tons. In 2023, the company produced 3.845 million metric tons of pellets, which is 36.5% less than in 2022.
Ferrexpo owns a 100% stake in Yeristivsky Mining and Processing Plant LLC, a 99.9% stake in Bilanivsky Mining and Processing Plant LLC, and 100% of the shares in Poltava Mining and Processing Plant PJSC.
FERREXPO, MINING AND PROCESSING PLANT, PELLETS, PRODUCTION, VAT
European Union countries imported a record amount of liquefied natural gas from Russia’s Yamal LNG project in the first half of 2026, despite the gradual implementation of a ban on Russian gas supplies, the Financial Times reported, citing data from the analytics firm Kpler and the environmental organization Urgewald.
According to the publication, European countries received approximately 9.9 million metric tons of LNG from “Yamal LNG” between January and June, which is about 18% more than during the same period in 2025. This marks the highest half-year figure since exports from the project began in 2017.
Reuters cites slightly different operational data: according to Kpler, shipments to the EU totaled 9.97 million metric tons and increased by 16%. The discrepancy between the figures may be due to updates in information regarding tanker movements and the actual unloading dates of the shipments. Overall, both sources confirm imports of approximately 10 million metric tons and the setting of a new record.
In total, 140 tanker shipments were dispatched from Yamal LNG in the first half of the year. Of these, 136—or more than 97%—arrived at EU ports. China received only four shipments during the same period. Thus, the European market effectively absorbed nearly all exports from Russia’s largest Arctic LNG project.
The estimated value of the shipments delivered to the EU is 5.96 billion euros, or about 6.82 billion dollars. The main destinations were terminals in France, Belgium, and Spain.
The increase in imports occurred as European companies prepared for the final cessation of Russian gas supplies. According to estimates by the EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), Russian LNG imports increased by 11% year-over-year in January–May 2026, while Russian pipeline gas supplies rose by 7%. Among the reasons cited by the agency is the early delivery of part of the contracted volumes before new restrictions took effect.
However, it is not yet accurate to say that the purchase of all Russian LNG is already banned in the EU. As of April 25, 2026, the ban applies to imports under short-term contracts concluded before June 17, 2025. Deliveries under previously concluded long-term contracts may continue until January 1, 2027. After that date, a complete ban on Russian LNG imports is set to take effect.
Therefore, a significant portion of Yamal LNG deliveries in the first half of the year could have been made under existing long-term contracts and did not formally violate European restrictions.
Data on the increase in the share of Russian gas in EU imports from 12% to 14% also requires clarification. According to the European Commission and the Council of the EU, Russian LNG and pipeline gas accounted for approximately 12% of European gas imports in 2025 overall. ACER estimated Russia’s share during the 2025–2026 winter season at approximately 14%. These figures relate to different periods and therefore cannot be directly interpreted as a definitive annual increase in market share of two percentage points.
The increase in supplies was also driven by the current restriction on the transshipment of Russian LNG at European ports for onward shipment to third countries. As a result, most of the gas arriving at EU terminals remains on the European market rather than being transshipped to other vessels for transport to Asia.
These record purchases highlight the tension between the EU’s policy of phasing out Russian energy sources and the need to ensure stable gas supplies amid a tight global market. At the same time, they highlight the Yamal LNG project’s dependence on European port, shipping, and financial infrastructure: with limited access to Asian routes, Russia has so far been unable to redirect a significant portion of its Arctic LNG to China.
The Yamal LNG project is located on the Yamal Peninsula in the Russian Arctic and is controlled by the Russian company Novatek. Novatek owns 50.1% of the project, with France’s TotalEnergies and China’s CNPC each holding 20%, and the Silk Road Fund holding 9.9%. The project’s production capacity is approximately 17.4 million metric tons of LNG per year.
The EU finalized its phased phase-out of Russian natural gas on January 26, 2026. A complete ban on Russian LNG is set to take effect on January 1, 2027, and on pipeline gas in the fall of 2027. In the event of a serious threat to energy supplies, the European Commission will be able to temporarily suspend certain restrictions for up to four weeks.
Original source Financial Times
EU countries have agreed to extend temporary protection for refugees from Ukraine for another year—until March 2028—but have imposed restrictions on granting it to new applicants who are subject to military service.
The decision was announced on Wednesday in Brussels, according to the EU Council’s press service.
“Today, EU countries agreed to extend the temporary protection status granted to refugees from Ukraine until March 4, 2028, fulfilling the EU’s commitment to support Ukraine and its people for as long as necessary. Extending protection for another year will provide clarity and predictability for all those fleeing the war,” the statement said.
At the same time, “recognizing both the need to protect displaced persons and Ukraine’s need to defend itself against Russia’s illegal war, EU countries agreed that temporary protection should be granted only to those who fulfill their military obligations in Ukraine.”
The press release notes that, “given Ukraine’s evolving defense needs, temporary protection will henceforth be granted only to those who are fulfilling their military obligations in Ukraine,” but this restriction will apply only to new applicants for temporary protection. “It will not apply to those who are already benefiting from temporary protection in the EU,” the press release explains.
The statement also clarifies that, in practice, to obtain temporary protection, individuals displaced from Ukraine will have to prove that they have fulfilled their military obligations. “ “For example, this can be done by presenting a passport with an exit stamp issued by the Ukrainian authorities, which confirms that they legally left Ukraine and, therefore, have fulfilled their military obligations. It can also be done by presenting a document, in paper or electronic format, confirming discharge from military service or the fulfillment of military obligations,” the statement notes.
Temporary protection has currently been extended until March 4, 2027, and since March 2022, more than 4 million displaced persons from Ukraine have been receiving protection in the EU.
Commenting on the decision, Jim O’Callaghan, Ireland’s Minister for Justice, Home Affairs, and Migration and current EU Presidency holder, said: “We remain unwavering in our support for Ukraine against Russia’s illegal war of aggression. Today, we decided to extend the protection status we provide to those fleeing the war for another year, until March 2028. This provides stability for those who have found safety in the EU. The message is clear: we continue to support Ukraine. And as part of our support, we also want to ensure that Ukraine can defend itself. That is why our temporary protection scheme takes into account Ukraine’s legitimate needs.”
The Council of the EU will formally adopt the decision to extend temporary protection in the coming weeks. The decision will be published in the Official Journal of the EU and will enter into force the following day.
Ukrainian and Uzbek companies intend to expand cooperation in mechanical engineering, energy, IT, the food industry, and the textile industry. Participants at the Ukrainian-Uzbek Business Forum, which took place on July 13, 2026, in Lviv, discussed prospects for implementing joint projects.
According to the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the forum was opened by Gennady Chizhikov, President of the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, and Davron Vakhobov, Chairman of the Uzbek Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The event was attended by approximately 90 representatives from the business community, government agencies, industry associations, and chambers of commerce and industry from both countries.
Alisher Kurmanov, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Uzbekistan to Ukraine, also took part in the forum. The participation of the head of the Uzbek diplomatic mission underscored the intergovernmental level of the meeting and Tashkent’s interest in developing direct contacts with Ukrainian businesses. Kurmanov has headed the Uzbek Embassy in Ukraine since 2020.
The forum participants were addressed by Khristina Kalish, head of the Department of Economic Policy of the Lviv Regional Military Administration; Natalia Karpenchuk-Konopatskaya, vice president of the Lviv Chamber of Commerce and Industry; Mirziyod Yunusov, chairman of the “Uzeltexsanoat” Association; Mirziyod Yunusov, Oleg Revchuk, head of the Ukrainian side of the Ukrainian-Uzbek Business Council, and Erkindjon Malikov, chairman of the Association of Exporters of Uzbekistan.
According to Chizhikov, the interest of Uzbek partners extends beyond traditional supplies of food and pharmaceutical products.
“We are ready to offer high-value-added niches—machinery manufacturing, energy equipment, and IT solutions for ‘smart’ cities. This is the level of cooperation that matches the ambitions of both our countries,” stated the president of the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
Participants identified the development of new logistics routes between Ukraine and Central Asia as one of the main areas of cooperation. The Ukrainian side views Uzbekistan as a regional transportation and trade hub that can provide access to the markets of neighboring countries.
The Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry proposed that Uzbek logistics operators and customs services work together to create “green corridors.” Such routes could speed up the delivery of Ukrainian agricultural and food products to Uzbekistan, as well as the transport of Uzbek textiles through Ukraine to European countries.
Forum participants held direct B2B negotiations. Promising areas of cooperation identified included pharmaceuticals, machinery and industrial equipment manufacturing, energy, agricultural processing, food products, textiles, chemical products, and digital solutions for municipal services.
Industrial cooperation holds additional potential. Ukrainian companies can supply Uzbekistan with energy and technological equipment, components, pharmaceutical products, and value-added agricultural products. Uzbek enterprises, in turn, are interested in expanding exports of textiles, raw cotton, polymer materials, fertilizers, and other chemical products.
The legal framework for investment cooperation is provided by a bilateral agreement on the promotion and mutual protection of investments, signed in 1993. A preferential trade regime is also in effect between the countries, and imports of goods from Ukraine to Uzbekistan are exempt from customs duties under existing free trade agreements.
According to data from the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, trade turnover between Ukraine and Uzbekistan reached $315 million in 2025, an increase of 14% compared to 2024. Ukrainian exports totaled $186.5 million. Based on these figures, imports of Uzbek goods into Ukraine can be estimated at approximately $128.5 million, and Ukraine’s trade surplus at approximately $58 million.
Thus, the latest complete annual data indicate a trade volume of about $315 million. This figure remains significantly below the potential of the two markets; however, the 14% growth indicates a gradual recovery of economic ties.
Ukrainian exports to Uzbekistan consist primarily of pharmaceutical products, machinery and equipment, meat and meat products, confectionery, and other food products. Ukraine imports mainly textiles, cotton and textile raw materials, polymer materials, fertilizers, and chemical products from Uzbekistan.
In the medium term, growth in trade volume will depend on shipping costs and transit times, the restoration of reliable transport corridors, the availability of cargo insurance, and companies’ ability to organize regular shipments. Uzbekistan could become one of the main gateways for Ukrainian manufacturers to Central Asian markets, while Ukraine is of interest to Uzbek businesses as a potential route to the EU market.
The Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry is a non-governmental, self-governing organization representing the interests of Ukrainian businesses. The Chamber promotes exports, organizes business missions, and provides services related to product certification, force majeure certification, international arbitration, and the search for foreign partners.
The Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Uzbekistan represents the interests of the republic’s entrepreneurs, participates in the development of exports, the attraction of investments, the organization of business missions, and the establishment of contacts between Uzbek and foreign companies.
The “Uzeltexsanoat” Association brings together enterprises in Uzbekistan’s textile, apparel, and knitwear industries. It participates in the modernization of enterprises, the development of value-added cotton processing, and the promotion of finished textile products to foreign markets.
The Uzbekistan Exporters Association provides companies with support in entering foreign markets, finding buyers, and organizing export shipments.
BUSINESS FORUM, LVIV, UKRAINE, UZBEKISTAN, Vakhobov, ЧИЖИКОВ
