According to Fixygen, the cryptocurrency market is ending the week on a downtrend: Bitcoin is hovering around $73,500, Ethereum around $2,000, while investors are reducing risk amid geopolitical tensions, outflows from crypto ETFs, and cautious expectations regarding U.S. interest rates.
As of May 29, Bitcoin was trading around $73,550, Ethereum around $2,000. During the day, BTC fell to $72,560, and ETH to $1,970, reflecting continued pressure on the largest crypto assets following a sharp deterioration in market sentiment.
The main external factor of the week was the escalation of geopolitical risks following U.S. strikes on Iran. Against this backdrop, investors shifted to safer assets, oil prices rose, and expectations for a Fed rate cut dimmed due to the potential for increased inflationary pressure. This was a negative combination for the crypto market, as digital assets remain sensitive to liquidity, interest rates, and risk appetite.
Over the week, Bitcoin shifted from cautious consolidation around $76,000 to a decline toward the $73,000 range. As recently as May 24, the market remained in a wait-and-see mode: BTC was trading near $76,000, Ethereum near $2,100, and market participants were assessing outflows from ETFs and the prospects for digital asset regulation in the U.S. By the end of the week, pressure intensified, and the recovery in demand from institutional investors proved insufficient to reverse the market trend.
Flows into exchange-traded funds became a significant factor. According to Farside Investors, on May 26, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a combined net outflow of approximately $648.6 million. The previous week also saw negative trends for these funds: on May 19, outflows totaled approximately $331.1 million; on May 20, $70.5 million; on May 21, $100.9 million; and on May 22, $105.2 million.
According to market estimates, the total outflow from cryptocurrency ETFs over the past two weeks exceeded $2.5 billion. This has become one of the key signals that institutional investors are temporarily reducing their exposure to digital assets amid high volatility and uncertainty in global markets.
Large holders exerted additional pressure on Bitcoin. According to the Economic Times, BTC consolidated around $73,600 amid increased activity from so-called “whales,” and outflows from large addresses reached their highest level since February. The market typically interprets this signal as a possible indication that major players are preparing to sell or reallocate their positions.
Ethereum also remained under pressure. The largest altcoin fell to around $2,000, and spot Ethereum ETFs, according to SoSoValue, recorded several consecutive days of net outflows in mid-May. ETH’s weakness heightened caution in the altcoin market, where investors typically reduce positions more quickly amid declining liquidity.
Among the largest cryptocurrencies, XRP and Solana were also under pressure. According to Barron’s, amid a deteriorating external environment, Ethereum fell more sharply than Bitcoin, while XRP and Solana also lost several percentage points. This confirms that the sell-off was broad-based rather than isolated and affected both core assets and riskier market segments.
A notable event of the week was Tether’s announcement of plans to launch a digital token pegged to the Georgian lari, with the support of the Georgian government. The project could become one of the rare examples of cooperation between a private stablecoin issuer and a government; however, details regarding the token’s structure and the role of regulators remain unclear.
Thus, the crypto market ends the week in a weak position. Short-term dynamics depend on three factors: whether outflows from ETFs continue or stop, investor reactions to geopolitical risks, and expectations regarding Fed interest rates. Until these factors provide the market with a sustainable impetus for recovery, Bitcoin remains in a zone of heightened volatility, while altcoins face even stronger pressure.
The cryptocurrency market remains one of the most volatile segments of global finance. Bitcoin and Ethereum hold the largest market capitalization shares among digital assets, and the launch of spot ETFs in the U.S. has strengthened the crypto market’s link to traditional financial markets, institutional capital flows, and monetary policy expectations.
The UK is considering introducing an additional tax on non-residents who own high-value residential property in the country, according to the Financial Times.
This involves a potential surcharge on the already approved luxury home tax, which is set to take effect in April 2028. The new levy will apply to properties valued at £2 million or more. The UK Treasury refers to the proposed additional measure as the “oligarch tax” or the “non-resident surcharge.”
Under the basic scale of the new tax, owners of homes valued between £2 million and £2.5 million will pay an additional £2,500 annually. For properties valued at up to £3.5 million, the levy will be £3,500; for those up to £5 million, £5,000; and for properties valued at over £5 million, £7,500 per year.
Initially, authorities estimated that the new tax on luxury housing would generate approximately £430 million annually for the budget. However, the introduction of an additional surcharge for non-residents could increase revenue. According to The Times, foreign and international owners may account for 25–35% of the approximately 165,000 properties that could potentially be subject to the new levy.
British authorities link the initiative not only to the need to replenish the budget but also to an attempt to ease pressure on the housing market, particularly in London. The Treasury is examining the extent to which demand from foreign buyers affects property prices and housing affordability for British households.
The new tax is officially called the High Value Council Tax Surcharge. It will apply to residential properties in England valued at £2 million or more. The Valuation Office Agency will be responsible for assessing the properties, and the surcharge itself will be collected alongside council tax but will go to the central budget.
The British luxury real estate market has traditionally remained one of the key sectors for international investors. The highest concentration of high-end housing is found in London and the southeast of England. Market experts warn that the new tax could increase pressure on the segment of properties valued at around £2 million, as sellers and buyers will seek to avoid falling into the new tax bracket.
Ukrzaliznytsia JSC announced a reduction in the number of passenger cars on trains serving routes with lower demand and their redeployment to routes with the highest demand.
“This allows us, given the shortage of rolling stock, to schedule additional trains and increase the number of cars on the most in-demand routes,” Ukrzaliznytsia stated in a Telegram post on Friday.
It is noted that seven train pairs will soon be transferred to daily service. Specifically, these include train No. 4/3 Uzhhorod – Dnipro, No. 86/85 Lviv – Zaporizhzhia, No. 128/127 Lviv – Kryvyi Rih, Zaporizhzhia, No. 78/77 Kovel – Odesa, No. 88/87 Kovel – Dnipro, as well as trains No. 7/8 Kharkiv – Odesa and No. 121/122 Mykolaiv – Kyiv.
Among other things, the company is resuming service on train No. 143/144 Sumy–Rakhiv. Thus, the route will connect northern Slobozhanshchyna and Sivershchyna with the western part of the country and provide direct service between Sumy, Bilopillia, and Konotop and Vinnytsia, Khmelnytskyi, Ternopil, Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Yaremche, and Vorokhta.
In addition, Ukrzaliznytsia has scheduled an additional train No. 227/228 Kyiv–Chernivtsi between the capital and Bukovina, which will run every other day via Vinnytsia, Khmelnytskyi, Ternopil, Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, and Kolomyia. The train will consist of open-seating, compartment, and SV (first-class) cars.
“Ticket sales for these scheduled trains will open in accordance with the trains’ running dates. The advance booking period depends on the specific route and ranges from 20 to 5 days prior to the departure date,” the company explained.
In January–March of this year, PJSC “Industrial and Manufacturing Enterprise ”Kryvbasvibuhprom” saw its net profit drop by 84% compared to the same period last year—to UAH 7.124 million from UAH 44.542 million.
According to the company’s interim report, available to the Interfax-Ukraine agency, revenue from ordinary activities for this period decreased by 34.4%—to UAH 269.883 million from UAH 411.670 million.
Retained earnings as of the end of March 2026 amounted to UAH 940.423 million.
According to the 2025 report, the company’s net profit last year increased by 20.8% compared to 2024—to UAH 185.845 million from UAH 153.893 million. At the same time, revenue from ordinary activities for this period increased by 18.3%—to UAH 1,751.775 million from UAH 1,480.669 million.
In 2024, the company reported a net profit of UAH 153.893 million, compared to UAH 95.121 million in 2023.
“Kryvbasvibuhprom” provides blasting services in the quarries of Ukraine’s mining enterprises. It is a major producer of emulsion and non-water-resistant explosives. The company’s operational chain includes storage, processing, transportation, and blasting operations themselves.
According to the State Registration Service data for the first quarter of 2026, Quarex Ltd (Cyprus) owns 93.1642% of the company’s shares, while umgi investments LLC of the SCM Group holds 6.5619%.
The authorized capital of Kryvbasvibuhprom is UAH 97.022 million, with a par value of UAH 1 per share.
The Ukrainian Dairy Industry Association (UDIA) advocates a return to a full food labeling regime to prevent future product counterfeiting and misleading consumer information, according to a statement from the Association.
In its view, at the start of the full-scale invasion, legislative changes that allowed labeling requirements to be suspended were justified; however, today enterprises in frontline regions have sufficient state support tools under the “Made in Ukraine” policy—specifically, compensation for equipment purchases, recovery programs, and property insurance.
Furthermore, even in areas close to the combat zone, manufacturers have the ability to establish stable supply chains and continue operations without the need to maintain simplified labeling requirements, the Association believes.
“At the same time, it is precisely in these regions that the activities of certain manufacturers of counterfeit products are currently being observed, who are effectively using the resolution as a tool to legitimize unscrupulous practices. Therefore, maintaining this regulation poses risks to public health, misleads consumers, and effectively creates favorable conditions for illegal business and food fraud,” the Association emphasizes.
As reported, on March 3, 2022, the Cabinet of Ministers adopted Resolution No. 186 “Certain Issues Regarding the Labeling of Food Products Under Martial Law,” which temporarily permits manufacturers not to update labeling in cases of forced changes to the recipe due to raw material shortages or supply issues.